Which of these is an i-statement?

How does that make you feel? Using I Statements to Communicate Emotions

You may recognize the "I Statement" as an effective tool for kids to identify emotions, understand beliefs, and influence behavior. But why are feelings so important for children? Today’s blog answers how to help kids talk about feelings effectively using a foundational component of social-emotional learning: The I Statement.

Here’s the 3 Part I Statement : I feel + (emotion) + when + (event) + because + (thought about event).

This post offers some psychological background on why the I Statement is a great tool for kids. For a thorough breakdown of how to teach the I Statement, take a look at this I Statements full lesson plan.

Psychological Theories Behind The I Statements:

Two popular psychotherapeutic theories offer insight into the I Statement:

1. Cognitive Behavioral Theory (CBT): CBT helps clients identify irrational thoughts. The basic principle of CBT is that our thoughts, behaviors, and emotions all interact with one another. So, if you change your thoughts, your emotions and behaviors are likely to change too.

2. Rational-Emotive Behavioral Therapy (REBT): REBT is a more confrontational approach that challenges irrational beliefs. It uses the ABC model of emotions to change thought patterns:

(A) An activating event happens in a person’s life;

(B) The person experiences certain beliefs;

(C) These negative thoughts, when irrational, cause emotional consequences;

(D) Therapeutic techniques such as I Statements challenge a person to dispute their irrational beliefs;

(E) By changing these beliefs, the person improves their new emotional consequence.

Which of these is an i-statement?

Connection Between Thoughts and Beliefs

Children and adults often experience psychological difficulty because they struggle with difficult thoughts and beliefs. Without understanding how one’s thoughts connect with emotions, it's easy to fall into the trap of believing that external events cause particular emotions. The I Statement empowers kids with some choice over their emotions. By changing thoughts or behaviors, kids gain access to new emotional experiences. The first step in this process, however, is simply identifying their current emotion.

It’s important to remember that SEL techniques like I Statement don't replace therapy. We’re not exploring students’ psychological history in-depth, but we are spending time teaching broad psycho-educational strategies that can be helpful to kids who practice them.

Take some time this week to ask your kids about their feelings. Try working through an I Statement together – you might be surprised by the results!


Free Mindfulness and SEL Lessons

14-Day Unlimited Access to 12 Lessons across 8 grades

Sign Up


Meet Munchy and Jumpy

Tales of Mindfulness, Social-Emotional Learning, and Second Chances

Which of these is an i-statement?
Learn More

Written by

Charlie Merrow

Charlie has over a decade of experience working in education across the world in North America, Asia, and Africa as a classroom teacher, curriculum specialist, university instructor, and educational researcher. His passion lies in promoting education equity and development through mindfulness and inclusive practices. Charlie has a MA in Special Education, is a PhD candidate studying Education Equity, a licensed special education teacher, a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer, and a certified yoga instructor.

For Apple's messaging service, see iMessage.

In interpersonal communication, an I-message or I-statement is an assertion about the feelings, beliefs, values, etc. of the person speaking, generally expressed as a sentence beginning with the word "I", and is contrasted with a "you-message" or "you-statement", which often begins with the word "you" and focuses on the person spoken to. Thomas Gordon coined the term "I message" in the 1960s while doing play therapy with children. He added the concept to his book for parents, P.E.T.: Parent Effectiveness Training (1970).[1][2] Not every message that begins with the word "I" is an I-message.

I-messages are often used with the intent to be assertive without putting the listener on the defensive by avoiding accusations. They are also used to take ownership for one's feelings rather than implying that they are caused by another person. An example of this would be to say: "I really am getting backed up on my work since I don't have the financial report yet", rather than: "you didn't finish the financial report on time!" (The latter is an example of a "you-statement").[3]

I-messages or I-statements can also be used in constructive criticism. For instance, one might say, "I had to read that section of your paper three times before I understood it", rather than, "This section is worded in a really confusing way", or "You need to learn how to word a paper more clearly." The former comment leaves open the possibility that the fault lies with the giver of the criticism. According to the Conflict Resolution Network, I-statements are a dispute resolution conversation opener that can be used to state how one sees things and how one would like things to be, without using inflaming language.[4]

I-message construction[edit]

While the underlying rationale and approach to I-messages is similar in various systems, there are both three-part and four-part models for constructing I-messages.

The simplest form, as frequently taught, is a single two-part sentence:

  1. When you... (objective event; 1st event),
  2. I feel... (subjective feeling; 2nd event).

It should be cautioned that "when you..." should be based on an objective event and avoid claims regarding intent. "When you said my birthday was in the wrong month, I felt like you don't care about me," is preferred over, "When you act like you don't care about me and my birthday..." This allows people talking to focus on events and feelings as separate events, which both allows people to express their feelings more clearly and helps clarify the initial event and reach agreement between parties.

A three-part model is proposed by the University of Tennessee Family & Consumer Sciences for improving communication with children:

  1. I feel... (Insert feeling word)
  2. when... (tell what caused the feeling).
  3. I would like... (tell what you want to happen instead).[5]

According to Hope E. Morrow, a common pitfall in I-statement construction is using phrases like "I feel that..." or "I like that..." which typically express an opinion or judgment, such as "I feel that you don't care" or "I feel that you don't do your fair share of the work". Morrow favors following "I feel..." with a feeling such as "sad", "angry", etc.[6]

Gordon advises that to use an I-message successfully, there should be congruence between the words one is using and one's affect, tone of voice, facial expression and body language. Gordon also describes a 3-part I-message, called a "confrontive" I-message, with the following parts:

  • non-blameful description of the listener's behavior
  • the effect of that behavior on the speaker
  • the speaker's feelings about that effect

He describes the I-message as an appeal for help from the other person, and states that the other person is more likely to respond positively when the message is presented in that way.[7]

Conflict resolution[edit]

When an "I" message contains "you-messages", conflict situations can be harder to address. For example: "I feel..., when you..., and I want you to..." This can put the receiver of the statement on the defensive. In a dispute, use of a phrase that begins with "I want" may encourage the parties to engage in positional problem solving. Positional problem solving is stating the outcome that the person wants, rather than the reason the person wants the problem solved. For example, "I want you to take out the trash every night" is positional problem solving, and "I don't want the kitchen to smell bad" is the reason. Declaring a single acceptable solution at the start makes many conflicts more difficult to resolve.

An "interest-based" approach to conflict resolution suggests using statements that reflect why the individual wants something.[8]

The goals of an "I" message in an interest-based approach:

  • to avoid using "you" statements that will escalate the conflict
  • to respond in a way that will de-escalate the conflict
  • to identify feelings
  • to identify behaviors that are causing the conflict
  • to help individuals resolve the present conflict and/or prevent future conflicts.[8]

The Ohio Commission on Dispute Resolution and Conflict Management summarized this approach as follows: "A sender of a message can use a statement that begins with 'I' and expresses the sender's feelings, identifies the unwanted behavior, and indicates a willingness to resolve the dispute, without using 'you' statements or engaging in positional problem solving".[8]

The Commission proposed a four-part I-message:

  1. "I feel ___ (taking responsibility for one's own feelings)
  2. "I don't like it when__ " (stating the behavior that is a problem)
  3. "because____" (what it is about the behavior or its consequences that one objects to)
  4. "Can we work this out together?" (be open to working on the problem together).[8]

Marital stability and relationship analysis researcher John Gottman notes that although I-statements are less likely than You-statements to be critical and to make the listener defensive, "you can also buck this general rule and come up with 'I' statements like 'I think you are selfish' that are hardly gentle. So the point is not to start talking to your spouse in some stilted psychobabble. Just keep in mind that if your words focus on how you're feeling rather than on accusing your spouse, your discussion will be far more successful."[9]

Shifting gears[edit]

Thomas Gordon writes, "Although I-messages are more likely to influence others to change than You-messages, still it is a fact that being confronted with the prospect of having to change is often disturbing to the changee." A quick shift by the sender of the I-message to an active listening posture can achieve several important functions in this situation, according to Gordon. He states that in Leader Effectiveness Training courses, this is called "shifting gears", and states that the person might shift back to an I-message later in the conversation.[10]

Use of the concept[edit]

In his book about mentoring, Gordon F. Shea states that communications specialists find that I-messages are a less threatening way to confront someone one wants to influence, and suggests a three-part I-message: a neutral description of planned behaviour, consequences of the behaviour, and the emotions of the speaker about the situation.[11]

Carol M. Davis' manual for health care workers calls I-messages an "important skill", but emphasizes that use of an I-message does not guarantee that the other person will respond in a helpful way. It presents an I-message as a way that one can take responsibility for one's own feelings and express them without blaming someone else.[12] Sheafor, Horejsi, and Horejsi's manual for social workers presents I-messages as a technique with the purpose of improving the effectiveness of communication.[13]

Emotional reactions[edit]

A study in Hong Kong of children's reactions to messages from their mothers found that children are most receptive to I-messages that reveal distress, and most antagonistic towards critical you-messages.[14] A study with university students as subjects did not find differences in emotional reactions to I-messages and you-messages for negative emotions, but did find differences in reactions for positive emotions.[15]

A study of self-reported emotional reactions to I-statements and you-statements by adolescents found that accusatory you-statements evoked greater anger and a greater inclination for antagonistic response than assertive I-statements.[16]

See also[edit]

  • Conflict resolution
  • Face saving
  • Flaming (Internet)
  • Nonviolent Communication
  • Passive aggression
  • Passivity

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Gordon 1995 p. xiii
  2. ^ Gordon, Thomas. Origins of the Gordon Model. Gordon Training International. Retrieved on: 2012-01-17.
  3. ^ "I" Statements not "You" Statements, International Online Training Program On Intractable Conflict, Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, USA
  4. ^ When to Use "I" Statements from 12 Skills: 4. Appropriate Assertiveness. Conflict Resolution Network. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
  5. ^ Brandon, Denise [fcs.tennessee.edu/humandev/kidsmart/ks_c2a.pdf "I" Message Worksheet]. University of Tennessee, Extension Family and Consumer Sciences. Retrieved on: 2012-01-17.
  6. ^ Constructing I-Statements Archived 2012-02-20 at the Wayback Machine, Hope E. Morrow, Massachusetts, MFT, CTS, 1998–2009.
  7. ^ Gordon 1995 p. 112
  8. ^ a b c d Rethinking "I" Statements, from Communication Skills, Skills and Concepts of Conflict Management. Ohio Commission on Dispute Resolution & Conflict Management. Retrieved 2011-02-12.
  9. ^ Gottman, John; Silver, Nan (1999). "Solve Your Solvable Problems". The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Three Rivers Press. pp. 164–165. ISBN 978-0-609-80579-4.
  10. ^ Gordon, Thomas (2001). Leader Effectiveness Training (L.E.T.): The Foundation for Participative Management and Employee Involvement. Perigee. pp. 113–115. ISBN 9780399527135.
  11. ^ Shea 2001, p. 50.
  12. ^ Davis 1996 p. 100
  13. ^ Sheafor 1996 p. 166
  14. ^ Cheung 2003 pp. 3–14
  15. ^ Bippus 2005 pp. 26–45
  16. ^ Kubany, E.S. et al., "Verbalized Anger and Accusatory "You" Messages as Cues for Anger and Antagonism among Adolescents", Adolescence, Vol. 27, No. 107, pp. 505-16, Fall 1992.

References[edit]

  • Gordon, Thomas; W. Sterling Edwards (1995). Making the patient your partner: Communication Skills for Doctors and Other Caregivers (Edition of 1997). Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780865692558.
  • Cheung, Siu-Kau; Sylvia Y.C. Kwok (2003). "How do Hong Kong children react to maternal I-messages and inductive reasoning?". The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work. 37 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1142/S0219246203000020.
  • Bippus, Amy M.; Stacy L. Young (2005). "Owning Your Emotions: Reactions to Expressions of Self- versus Other-Attributed Positive and Negative Emotions". Journal of Applied Communication Research. 33 (1): 26. doi:10.1080/0090988042000318503.
  • Shea, Gordon (2001). How to Develop Successful Mentor Behaviors. Thomas Crisp Learning. ISBN 978-1-56052-642-1.
  • Davis, Carol M. (2006). Patient Practitioner Interaction: An Experiential Manual for Developing the Art of Health Care (4th ed.). SLACK Incorporated. ISBN 9781556427206.
  • Sheafor, Bradford W.; Charles R. Horejsi; Gloria A. Horejsi (1996). Techniques and Guidelines for Social Work Practice. Allyn and Bacon (Original from the University of Michigan). ISBN 9780205191772.

What is an example of an I

You always leave your mess lying everywhere.” “I feel frustrated when I come home and the house is messy.” “You don't care about me or my feelings.”

What is an I

"I" Statements. "I" statements express thoughts, feelings, and ideas from a personal point of view. "You" statements. "You" statements focus on the person someone is speaking too rather the conflict; what they're feeling or believe.

What are the 5 types of I

Here's how to fill out those five steps..
When you… state the specific action your partner takes..
I feel… share how you feel inside when your partner did that thing..
I imagine… try to imagine your partner's perspective. ... .
I need/want… share what the frustrated part of you say that it needs in this situation. ... .
Would you….

What is an I

An “I” message or “I” statement is a style of communication that focuses on the feelings or beliefs of the speaker rather than thoughts and characteristics that the speaker attributes to the listener.