Who believed that new government without a bill of rights would be a major imperfection?
|
Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Show Already have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Log in through your institution Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $41.50 USD. How does it work?
journal article James Wilson versus the Bill of Rights: Progress, Popular Sovereignty, and the Idea of the U.S. ConstitutionPolitical Research Quarterly Vol. 67, No. 2 (JUNE 2014) , pp. 253-265 (13 pages) Published By: Sage Publications, Inc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24371781 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $41.50 - Download now and later Abstract Americans today may take the Bill of Rights for granted, but its inclusion in the U.S. Constitution originally was controversial. To understand why, I turn to James Wilson, a leading statesman of the founding era and the chief opponent of the Bill of Rights. Among other things, Wilson thought a bill of rights would bind future generations to an incomplete list of rights and deprive them of the right to define individual rights over time. His arguments against a constitutional bill of rights also offer a useful view of the complexity and diversity of American founding era thought. Journal Information Political Research Quarterly (PRQ) is a refereed scholarly journal publishing original research in all areas of political science. PRQ is published by the University of Utah and is the official journal of the Western Political Science Association. Most issues also feature field essays integrating and summarizing current knowledge in particular research areas. PRQ is published in March, June, September, and December. Publisher Information Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com Rights & Usage This item
is part of a JSTOR Collection. “A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against any government on earth, general or particular, and what no government should refuse, or rest on inference.” Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, December 20, 1787
No Need for a Bill of Rights Voting Record of the Constitutional Convention, showing the vote on the motion to appoint a committee to prepare a bill of rights, 1787, Records of the Continental and Confederation Congresses and the Constitutional Convention Dangerous and Unnecessary
 Almost Fatal Mistake Ratification of the Constitution by New York, with proposed amendments, July 26, 1788, Records of the General Government
Why a Bill of Rights? Change to the preamble to the Bill of Rights, August 25, 1789, Records of the U.S. Senate
The Ones that Failed Motions A–D proposing amendments that failed in the Senate, September 7, 1789, Records of the U.S. Senate
225 Years Old Virginia's ratification of the Bill of Rights, December 15, 1791, General Records of the U.S. Government Same great content in an interactive design! What did Hamilton believe about the bill of rights?Some Founding Fathers, most famously Alexander Hamilton, argued that it was not necessary to include a bill of rights in the Constitution. "the constitution is itself in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS.
Who believed in the bill of rights?Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Why did federalist oppose the bill of rights?The authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for ratification of the Constitution without a bill of rights. They thought no list of rights could be complete and that therefore it was best to make no list at all.
Which founding father opposed the bill of rights?One of the most influential objections to the proposed Constitution was that it lacked a bill of rights. Thomas Jefferson raised this issue in a December 1787 letter to Madison.
|
