So sánh rtx 2070 vs gtx 1080ti năm 2024
|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores35842304Core clock speed1481 MHz1410 MHzBoost clock speed1600 MHz1620 MHzNumber of transistors11,800 million10,800 millionManufacturing process technology16 nm12 nmPower consumption (TDP)250 Watt175 WattMaximum GPU temperature91 °Cno dataTexture fill rate354.4233.3Floating-point performance11,340 gflopsno data Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length10.5" (26.7 cm)229 mmWidth2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno dataSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pinSLI options+no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6Maximum RAM amount11 GB8 GBMemory bus width352 Bit256 BitMemory clock speed11000 MHz14000 MHzMemory bandwidth484.4 GB/s448.0 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CMulti monitor support+no dataHDMI++G-SYNC support++ TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GPU Boost3.0no dataVR Readyno data+Ansel+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)Shader Model6.46.5OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan+1.2.131CUDA+7.5 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 15% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 15% in Passmark. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 21% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 19% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1080 Ti 142490 +11.6% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 12% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 44% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 8% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 4% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 73% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 17% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 11% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 14% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 30% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 44% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01Benchmark coverage: 3% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01. SPECviewperf 12 - ShowcaseBenchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase. SPECviewperf 12 - MayaThis part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes. Benchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 17% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya. SPECviewperf 12 - CatiaBenchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia. SPECviewperf 12 - SolidworksBenchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 11% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks. SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NXBenchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 14% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX. SPECviewperf 12 - CreoBenchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 30% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo. SPECviewperf 12 - MedicalBenchmark coverage: 2% GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RTX 2070 by 44% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical. SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05Benchmark coverage: 2% RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 31% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05. SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds MaxThis part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games. Benchmark coverage: 1% RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 1080 Ti by 31% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 2070. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 1427 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 4.6 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 35 Mh/s no data Siacoin / SC (Sia) 2.96 Gh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.76 kh/s no data Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 630 Sol/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD129 +0% 129 +0% 1440p85 87 4K66 61 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207785−90 75−80 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey100 −1% 101 +1% Assassin's Creed Valhalla80−85 −4.8% 87 +4.8% Battlefield 5166 +31.7% 126 −31.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare130−140 −12.2% 147 +12.2% Cyberpunk 207785−90 +17.3% 75−80 −17.3% Far Cry 5120 +5.3% 114 −5.3% Far Cry New Dawn104 +1% 103 −1% Forza Horizon 4147 +3.5% 142 −3.5% Hitman 3150−160 −7.2% 164 +7.2% Horizon Zero Dawn100−110 −8.7% 113 +8.7% Red Dead Redemption 275−80 −51.9% 117 +51.9% Shadow of the Tomb Raider120 +7.1% 112 −7.1% Watch Dogs: Legion85−90 −24.4% 107 +24.4% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey90 +4.7% 86 −4.7% Assassin's Creed Valhalla80−85 +13.7% 73 −13.7% Battlefield 5154 +31.6% 117 −31.6% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare61 −113% 130 +113% Cyberpunk 207785−90 +17.3% 75−80 −17.3% Far Cry 5117 +6.4% 110 −6.4% Far Cry New Dawn102 +3% 99 −3% Forza Horizon 4145 +7.4% 135 −7.4% Hitman 3150−160 +6.3% 144 −6.3% Horizon Zero Dawn100−110 +18.2% 88 −18.2% Metro Exodus90 +15.4% 78 −15.4% Red Dead Redemption 265 +0% 65 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider113 +7.6% 105 −7.6% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt130−140 −21.5% 158 +21.5% Watch Dogs: Legion85−90 −9.3% 94 +9.3% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey71 +10.9% 64 −10.9% Assassin's Creed Valhalla80−85 +27.7% 65 −27.7% Battlefield 5149 +38% 108 −38% Cyberpunk 207785−90 +17.3% 75−80 −17.3% Far Cry 5109 +4.8% 104 −4.8% Far Cry New Dawn94 +4.4% 90 −4.4% Forza Horizon 4120 +9.1% 110 −9.1% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt98 +12.6% 87 −12.6% Watch Dogs: Legion85−90 +34.4% 64 −34.4% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare91 +4.6% 87 −4.6% Hitman 390−95 +1.1% 93 −1.1% Horizon Zero Dawn70−75 +16.4% 61 −16.4% Metro Exodus56 +12% 50 −12% Red Dead Redemption 241 −2.4% 42 +2.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider73 −4.1% 76 +4.1% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey62 +19.2% 52 −19.2% Assassin's Creed Valhalla55−60 +10% 50 −10% Battlefield 5118 +34.1% 88 −34.1% Cyberpunk 207740−45 +23.5% 30−35 −23.5% Far Cry 597 +10.2% 88 −10.2% Far Cry New Dawn88 +7.3% 82 −7.3% Forza Horizon 4102 +9.7% 93 −9.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt75−80 +18.5% 65−70 −18.5% Watch Dogs: Legion45−50 −2.2% 47 +2.2% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare52 +2% 51 −2% Hitman 350−55 +2% 50 −2% Horizon Zero Dawn35−40 +11.4% 35 −11.4% Metro Exodus35 +9.4% 32 −9.4% Red Dead Redemption 227 +0% 27 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider41 +2.5% 40 −2.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt72 +14.3% 63 −14.3% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey40 +11.1% 36 −11.1% Assassin's Creed Valhalla30−35 +6.5% 31 −6.5% Battlefield 570 +27.3% 55 −27.3% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +26.7% 14−16 −26.7% Far Cry 555 +12.2% 49 −12.2% Far Cry New Dawn57 +11.8% 51 −11.8% Forza Horizon 475 +19% 63 −19% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 −3.8% 27 +3.8% This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 2070 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 47.81 41.71 Recency 28 February 2017 27 August 2018 Cost $699 $499 Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 8 GB Memory bus width 352 256 Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 2304 Memory bandwidth 484.4 448 Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 175 Watt The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GeForce RTX 2070 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
