What is the difference between a warranty of merchantability and an implied warranty of fitness?

[social_warfare buttons=”Facebook,LinkedIn,Twitter”]

Understanding the Differences

Do you know the difference between an implied warranty and an express warranty?

Warranties are generally divided into two categories:

• Express Warranties
• Implied Warranties.

Express warranties are expressly made by the manufacturer or seller of a product. In most cases, express warranties are set forth in writing, but do not necessarily need to be in order to be deemed an express warranty. Obviously, the 2-10 HBW Contract is an express written warranty.

Implied warranties are warranties that arise from either the sale itself or the circumstances of the sale, and are created by legislation or the courts.

There are two main types of implied warranties:

• Implied warranties of merchantability
• Implied warranties of fitness.

The implied warranty of merchantability states a product will perform the purpose for which it was designed to a reasonable degree. The implied warranty of fitness states a product will reasonably perform a purpose specific to the intentions for which the product was purchased by the consumer.

2-10’s Offered Warranties

Based on the basic definitions above, it is clear why an express warranty is preferred for a product such as the one 2-10 HBW offers. Implied warranty laws can be subject to ambiguous and inconsistent interpretations that can vary not only from state to state, but indeed from court to court. In many cases, the only guidance in determining the scope and protection offered by an implied warranty is prior case law, where the court has determined what is covered rather than the parties to the contract. An express warranty eliminates such ambiguity.

The express written warranty offered by 2-10 HBW disclaims all implied warranties and is acknowledged to be the exclusive warranty by the builder/seller and the buyer. The Construction Performance Guidelines which follow the guidelines set forth by the National Association of Home Builders, taken together with the other provisions contained within the contract, clearly define the responsibilities of the builder/seller and the buyer, and helps set and manage expectations for all the interested parties, including 2-10 HBW.

For manufacturing companies, some of the most important terms in any contract for the purchase or sale of goods are the warranties that apply to those goods. This article will address one particular kind of warranty – the warranty of fitness for particular purpose.

A warranty of fitness for particular purpose generally arises in one of two ways. First, similar to the implied warranty of merchantability addressed in previous posts on this blog, a warranty of fitness for particular purpose will be implied by law under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) if certain conditions are met. Specifically, UCC 2-315 provides that

Where the seller at the time of contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill or judgment to select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless excluded or modified under the next section an implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for such purpose.

In other words, unless properly disclaimed in the contract, an implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose arises when: (1) the seller knows, or should know, buyer’s purpose for the goods; and (2) the seller knows, or should know, that buyer is relying on seller to determine what the buyer needs for that purpose. Imagine that a customer walks into a watch store, and tells the proprietor that he intends to go scuba diving and needs a watch to monitor his dive time. The customer then asks the proprietor to recommend a watch for the trip. In such circumstances, any recommendation by the proprietor almost certainly will be deemed to include a warranty that the watch is waterproof and otherwise suitable for scuba diving.

Second, the seller may expressly warrant in the contract that the goods will be fit for the buyer’s intended purpose. In such cases, the seller should take care to make sure that it really does know of buyer’s purpose and that the goods are, in fact, fit for that purpose. Unlike in the case of implied warranties, lack of knowledge generally does not allow the seller to avoid an express warranty that the goods are fit for buyer’s purpose.

In the context of business-to-business sales in the manufacturing supply chain, a manufacturer may ask, what is the particular purpose for which its goods must be fit? The answer is highly situational.  In some cases, the answer may be relatively simple. Similar to the scuba diving example above, a buyer may identify generally the use to which it intends to put the goods. For example, a buyer may ask a seller to supply a widget for use in a particular application.

More often, the answer involves looking at any specifications or other requirements provided by the buyer. For example, a manufacturer may receive from the buyer a set of tolerances that the product must meet. These requirements, together with any additional requirements or specifications provided throughout the process, generally will be considered to describe the “purpose” for which the goods will be used. In some cases, the specifications may be so detailed and all-encompassing as to effectively swallow any separate purpose for which buyer may have intended the goods. If a buyer supplies the manufacturer with detailed engineering drawings and tolerances such that seller is effectively building to print, most courts will hold that the buyer is no longer relying on seller to select the goods and, therefore, the implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose under UCC 2-315 does not apply. Although an express warranty of fitness for particular purpose does not require the buyer to have relied on seller to select the product, a sufficiently detailed set of specifications generally will be found to have fully described the buyer’s purposes such that compliance with the specifications usually is the same as finding that the goods were fit for buyer’s purpose.

Where commercial realities permit, manufacturers should consider disclaiming the implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose and rejecting any express warranty of fitness for particular purposes. This is particularly true where the manufacturer has only partial information regarding the purpose for which the goods will be used. While many buyers may question efforts by a manufacturer to avoid warranties that goods will be free from defect or merchantable, many buyers can be persuaded that it is not reasonable to require a warranty that the goods will be fit for a purpose which the buyer knows better than the seller.

Accordingly, when contracting for the sale or purchase of goods, manufacturers should be aware of the any warranties (express or implied) that the goods may be fit for a particular purpose. Like all warranties, both buyers and sellers must consider whether the warranties are appropriate for the transaction or whether they should be disclaimed or excluded from the contract.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

What is the difference between the implied warranty of merchantability and the implied warranty of fitness?

What is an implied warranty of fitness?

What is an implied warranty of merchantability?

What is an example of a warranty of merchantability?