What determines the intensity of a stimulus?

References

  • Bartlett, J. R., &Doty, R. W., Sr. (1974). Response of units in striate cortex of squirrel monkeys to visual and electrical stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology,37, 621–641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I., &Kaplan, R. (1970). Stimulus discriminability and S-R compatibility: Evidence for independent effects in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 434–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, C. (1992a). Psychological scaling within an information processing approach?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,15, 560–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, C. (1992b). Sensation and psychophysics of reaction time.International Journal of Psychology,27, 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, C., Gurlekian, J., &Harris, P. (1992). Reaction time and visual area: Searching for the determinants.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,30, 396–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucart, M., &Bonnet, C. (1990). Only stimulus energy affects the detectability of visual forms and objects.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 415–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucart, M., &Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Global shape cannot be attended without object identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 785–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, R. M., &Whitten, D. N. (1970). Visual adaptation in monkey cones: Recordings of late receptor potentials.Science,170, 1423–1426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. (1886). The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time.Brain,8, 512–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody, R. P., &Smith, J. K. (1991).Applied statistics and the SAS programming language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easland, G. S., &Wasserman, G. S. (1979). Multiple intracellular contributions to light adaptation in limulus ommatidia.Vision Research,19, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, B. L., Hochhaus, L., &Brown, J. R. (1985). Letter-naming as a function of intensity, degradation, S-R compatibility, and practice.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 467–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, S. H. (1868). über die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung nöthige Zeit [On the time necessary to a visual perception].Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlicher Akademie der Wissenschaften,57, 601–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Halstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. H. (1965).Vision and visual perception. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review,75, 359–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, G. R., &Hunter, J. J. (1964). Stimulus intensity effects depend upon the type of experimental design.Psychological Review,71, 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemilä, S. (1987). The stimulus-response functions of visual systems.Vision Research,27, 1253–1261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. E., &Sejnowski, T. J. (1986). Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 282–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laming, D. R. J. (1968).Information theory of choice-reaction times. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappin, J. S., &Disch, K. (1972). The latency operating characteristic: II. Effects of visual stimulus intensity on choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 367–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levick, W. R. (1973). Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells.Vision Research,13, 837–853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Link, S. W. (1978). The relative judgment theory of the psychometric function. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 619–630). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, S. W. (1992).The wave theory of discrimination and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1986).Response time. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. (1972). A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.Psychological Review,79, 14–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, R. J. W. (1973). Latency functions in human vision.Vision Research,13, 2219–2234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marrocco, R. T. (1975). Possible neural basis of brightness magnitude estimations.Brain Research,86, 128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J. (1961). Loudness and reaction time: A guided tour of the listener’s private world.Acta Psychologica,19, 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psycholog (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1993). A queue-series model for reaction time, with discrete-stage and continuous flow models as special cases.Psychological Review,100, 702–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naka, K. I., &Rushton, W. A. (1966). S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).Journal of Physiology,185, 587–599.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. J. (1977). Stimulus intensity and information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R. G., &Fisher, D. F. (1969). Effect of stimulus degradation and similarity on the trade-off between speed and accuracy in absolute judgements.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 7–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piéron, H. (1914). Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices [On the laws of variation of sensory processing time as a function of the excitatory intensity].L’Année Psychologique,20, 17–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piéron, H. (1920). Nouvelles recherches sur l’analyse du temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices [Further evidence on the laws of sensory processing time as a function of the excitatory intensity].L’Année Psychologique,22, 58–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piéron, H. (1952).The sensations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1986).Chronometric explorations of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweickert, R., Dahn, C., &McGuigan, K. (1988). Intensity and number of alternatives in hue identification: Piéron’s law and choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., &Fukuda, Y. (1974). Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: A comparison of W- cells with X- and Y-cells.Journal of Neurophysiology,37, 722–748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tepas, D. I., &Armington, J. C. (1962). Properties of evoked visual potentials.Vision Research,2, 449–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, T. (1977). Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels.Vision Research,17, 227–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, H. G., Jr.,Costa, L. D., &Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity.Vision Research,6, 645–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1886).Grundzüge der Physiologisches Psychologie [Elements of psychophysics]. Paris: Felix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

What is important for determining stimulus intensity?

It is determined by receptive field size and receptor density. There is an inherent paradox between the intensity of a stimulus and the ability to localize it.

What is intensity of stimulus?

Stimulus intensity is the strength of the sensory input to the brain. A stimulus has a threshold, or minimum degree of intensity needed for it to be detected and acted upon. For example, there is a minimum threshold for being able to hear something.

How do sensory receptors detect the intensity of a stimuli?

The intensity of the stimulus is encoded by the frequency of the action potentials. 5. Most receptors detect the stimulus via a subset of highly specialised ion channels which open (Na+) or close (K+) to evoke depolarisation of the membrane of the sensory ending in response to the stimulus. 6.

How does the brain detect intensity of a stimulus from nervous impulses?

The nervous system detects changes in our environment (known as stimuli) through cells called receptors. Receptors are sensitive to a number of different aspects of our environment, such as light, pressure (touch) and chemicals in the air (smell).