What are the HRM factors contributing to organizational performance?

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Anastasia A. Katou (Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing on the contingency perspective between business strategies and human resource (HR) practices, the purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of human resource management (HRM) system (which integrates both content and process of HR practices) on both proximal organisational outcomes (such as job satisfaction, motivation, and organisational commitment) and distal organisational outcomes (such as employee engagement, organisational citizen behaviour (OCB), co-operation among employees, intention to quit, and operational performance).

Design/methodology/approach

The analysis is based on a sample of 996 Greek employees working in 108 private organisations and the statistical method employed is structural equation modelling with bootstrapping estimation.

Findings

The results indicate that HRM content is more positively related to job satisfaction and motivation and less related to organisational commitment than HRM process. Moreover, HRM system is sequentially related to organisational outcomes (both directly and indirectly) and significantly influences employee job satisfaction and motivation, as well as OCB and co-operation among employees, and operational performance.

Research limitations/implications

The data were collected using a questionnaire at a single point in time, and thus, not allowing dynamic causal inferences. Considering that Greece is experiencing a severe financial crisis, the findings from this unique context may not generalise across other contexts.

Practical implications

The core messages to decision makers are that employee development and rewards are the major dimensions of the content of an HRM system and that consistency and distinctiveness are the principal features of the process of an HRM system, even in cases where the organisation is operating under an economic crisis environment.

Originality/value

Investigations into the relationship between HRM systems and organisational performance have become increasingly common. Nevertheless, empirical studies that measure the impact of HRM systems, which being contingent on business strategies integrate both content and process of HR practices on organisational performance are still rare. This paper partially fills this gap.

Keywords

  • Organizational performance
  • Human resource management
  • Human resource strategies

Citation

Katou, A.A. (2017), "How does human resource management influence organisational performance? An integrative approach-based analysis", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 66 No. 6, pp. 797-821. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2016-0004

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

What are the HRM factors contributing to organizational performance?

Organizational performance means an organization’s actual output or results as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives).

Definition of Organizational Performance

According to Richard, organizational performance includes three specific areas of firm outcomes:

  1. financial performance (profits, return on assets, return on investment);
  2. product market performance (sales, market share); and
  3. shareholder return (total shareholder return, economic value added).

Specialists in many fields are concerned with organizational performance, including strategic planners, operations managers, finance directors, legal advisors, and entrepreneurs (owners of the organization).

In recent years, many organizations have attempted to manage organizational performance using the balanced scorecard methodology where performance is tracked and measured in multiple dimensions such as:

  • Financial performance (e.g., shareholder return).
  • Customer service.
  • Social responsibility (e.g., corporate citizenship, community outreach).
  • Employee stewardship.

The organization itself does not perform any work, but its managers are performing their assigned works, and in a combination of these performed works is called organization performance.

Some factors are to be performed by the organization such as human and cultural factors, technology, natural recourses, economic factors, regulatory measures, markets, management philosophy, organizational culture (goals, values, beliefs & norms), organizational climate, motivated behavior and teamwork, structure, technological and physical resources, financial resources, leadership style.

The organization gets effectiveness, efficiency, development, and participant satisfaction outcomes with these resources.

After using all support and efforts when the organization produces a product or service, that is called organizational performance.

Factors of Organizational Performance

Organizations vary according to the relative influence of several factors related to the organization’s objective and the instruments and strategies chosen to achieve them.

These factors, which determine the structure, aims, and activities of the organization, can be grouped into:

  1. External factors: Those from the enabling environments that are not under the organization’s control but which affect its structure and development. They include:
    1. Economic factors
    2. Socio-economic factors
    3. Political-administrative factors
  2. Internal factors: Organizational characteristics, including:
    1. Purpose of the organization
    2. Organizational instruments
  3. Individual choice factors: Members’ joint or individual decisions regarding expected costs and benefits.

Older studies, especially in the 1970s, focused on the influence of internal factors, while more recent work has emphasized the importance of all three sets of factors.

Organizational Performance Model

A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change, or the Burke & Litwin Model, suggests linkages that hypothesize how performance is affected by internal and external factors.

It provides a framework to assess organizational and environmental dimensions that are keys to successful change. It demonstrates how these dimensions should be linked causally to achieve a change in performance.

The causal model links what could be understood from practice to what is known from research and theory.

The model discusses how different dimensions link with each other and how the external environment affects the different dimensions in an organization.

The model provides a guide for organizational diagnoses and planned, managed organizational change, clearly showing cause-and-effect relationships.

Outline of the Model

The model revolves around 12 organizational dimensions:

  1. External environment
  2. Mission and strategy
  3. Leadership
  4. Organizational culture
  5. Structure
  6. Management practices
  7. Systems
  8. Work unit climate
  9. Task and individual skills
  10. Individual needs and values
  11. Motivation
  12. Individual and organizational performance

The model also distinguishes between transformational and transactional organizational dynamics in organizations.

Internal and External Environment of Organizational Performance

Environmental factors play a major role in determining an organization’s success or failure. Managers should strive to maintain the proper alignment between their organizations and their environment.

All organizations have both external and internal environments.

An organization’s internal environment is composed of the elements within the organization, including current employees, management, and especially corporate culture, which defines employee behavior.

Although some elements affect the organization, others only affect the manager.

A manager’s philosophical or leadership style directly impacts employees. Traditional managers give explicit instructions to employees, while progressive managers empower employees to make many of their own decisions.

Changes in philosophy and/or leadership style are under the manager’s control. The following sections describe some elements that make up the internal environment.

The internal environment consists of the organization’s owners, the board of directors, employees, the physical environment, and culture.

Owners are those who have property rights claims on the organization. The board of directors oversees a firm’s top managers, elected by stockholders.

Individual employees and the labor unions they sometimes join are other important parts of the internal environment. The physical environment, yet another part of the internal environment, varies greatly across organizations.

The external environment is composed of general and task environment layers. The general environment comprises the nonspecific elements of the organization’s surroundings that might affect its activities.

It has five dimensions: economic, technological, sociocultural, political-legal, and international. The effects of these dimensions on the organization are broad and gradual.

The task environment consists of specific dimensions of the organization’s surroundings likely to influence the organization. It also consists of five elements: competitors, customers, suppliers, regulators, and strategic partners.

Because these dimensions are associated with specific environmental organizations, their effects are likely to be more direct and immediate.

What are the internal factors that affect organizational performance?

The internal factors over which management and employees both have a great deal of control.

In particular, management has extensive control over the organization’s human resources policies and practices, financial, technological, and physical resources, structure, management philosophy, and leadership style.

Managing less directly includes organizational culture, climate, motivated behavior, and teamwork. These concepts tend to overlap, as we will see.

“Human Resources Management” appears at the center of the internal factors because effective human resources are essential to the organization’s survival and long-term success. People from the organization and people who manage the

processes that create the product or service for which the organization is in business.

How well these human resources are managed is probably the most critical factor in an organization’s overall performance.

Internal factors are connected, and they all tend to affect or interact with each other. It is enough to say that for an organization to be highly successful, all these internal factors must be intelligently and harmoniously managed.

Mention the environmental factors that affect HR activities.

The environmental factors are as follows, which affect the HR activities of the organization.

  • External factors comprised by;
    • Political and legal.
    • Technological.
  • Internal factors comprised by;
    • Strategy (Task and Leadership)
    • Organizational culture and conflict
    • Professional bodies.

The environment often provides a mass of ambiguous information.

What to make out of the information? What to accept and what to reject?

To answer these questions, three related concepts are relevant.

  • The created environment,
  • The domain and domain consensus, and
  • The task environment.

The HR department has to obtain environmental information and feeds it to key decision-makers.

The department may play a major role in making the decision. The department is also responsible for obtaining internal organizational information for consideration by strategic decision-makers.

But the role of the HR department is confined to a boundary-spanning role in that it helps link the organization to its environment through environmental scanning.

All these duties are to be performed by the HR department to make an excellent performance by HR, leading to achieving the organizational objectives.

What are the human resources management factors contributing to Organisational performance?

Some dimensions of HRMP are compensation, career advancement, career development, performance appraisal, employment security, training program, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, employee participation in decision making, teamwork, HR planning, staffing practices among others.

What is organizational performance in HRM?

“Performance” refers to the action of performing a specific task or set of tasks and it's measured on how successfully an individual or organized group performs such tasks. So, Organizational Performance refers to the analysis of an organization's performance against its objectives and goals.

What are the 5 main organizational factors?

Although many things can affect the choice of an appropriate structure for an organization, the following five factors are the most common: size, life cycle, strategy, environment, and technology.

What are the main factors of human resources management?

Top Critical HR Success Factors.
Culture. At the heart of every organization is its culture—the attitudes and behaviors defining how things get done. ... .
Talent Acquisition. ... .
Workforce Planning. ... .
Compensation. ... .
Benefits and Employee Wellness. ... .
Training. ... .
Leadership Development. ... .
Employee Engagement..