Tendency to perceive an object as having the same size despite changes in viewing distance
|
BarM., Kassam K. S., GhumanA. S., BoshyanJ., SchmidA. M., DaleA. M., HämäläinenM. S., MarinkovicK., SchacterD. L., RosenB. R., Halgren E. (2006). Top–down facilitation of visual recognition, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 449–454. Show
ChouinardP. A., IvanowichM. (2014). Is the primary visual cortex a center stage for the visual phenomenology of object size?J. Neurosci.34, 2013–2014.
ChouinardP. A., MorrisseyB. F., KöhlerS., GoodaleM. A. (2008). Repetition suppression in occipital–temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects, Neuroimage41, 130–144.
ChouinardP. A., NoultyW. A., SperandioI., LandryO. (2013). Global processing during the Muller–Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population, Exp. Brain Res.230, 219–231.
DehaeneS., NaccacheL., CohenL., BihanD. L., ManginJ. F., PolineJ. B., RiviereD. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming, Nat. Neurosci.4, 752–758.
DuttonG. N. (2003). Cognitive vision, its disorders and differential diagnosis in adults and children: knowing where and what things are, Eye (Lond.) 17, 289–304.
EngelS. A., GloverG. H., WandellB. A. (1997). Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI, Cereb. Cortex7, 181–192.
FangF., BoyaciH., KerstenD., Murray S. O. (2008). Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1, Curr. Biol.18, 1707–1712.
GoodaleM. A., MilnerA. D., JakobsonL. S., CareyD. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them, Nature349, 154–156.
GregoryR. L., WallaceJ. G., CampbellF. W. (1959). Changes in size and shape of visual afterimages observed in complete darkness during changes of position in space, Q. J. Exp. Psychol.11, 54–55.
HigashiyamaA., AdachiK. (2006). Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: evidence for proprioceptive theory, Vision Res.46, 3961–3976.
LeibowitzH., BrislinR., PerlmutterL., HennessyR. (1969). Ponzo perspective illusion as a manifestation of space perception, Science166, 1174–1176.
LeopoldD. A., LogothetisN. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys’ percepts during binocular rivalry, Nature379, 549–553.
LerchJ. P., EvansA. C. (2005). Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation, Neuroimage24, 163–173.
MaguireE. A., GadianD. G., JohnsrudeI. S., GoodC. D., AshburnerJ., FrackowiakR. S., Frith C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97, 4398–4403.
MaierA., WilkeM., AuraC., Zhu C., YeF. Q., LeopoldD. A. (2008). Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey, Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1193–1200.
MargE., AdamsJ. E. (1970). Evidence for a neurological zoom system in vision from angular changes in some receptive fields of single neurons with changes in fixation distance in the human visual cortex, Experientia26, 270–271.
Mon-WilliamsM., TresilianJ. R., PlooyA., Wann J. P., BroerseJ. (1997). Looking at the task in hand: vergence eye movements and perceived size, Exp. Brain Res.117, 501–506.
MurrayS. O., BoyaciH., KerstenD. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex, Nat. Neurosci.9, 429–434.
NiA. M., MurrayS. O., HorwitzG. D. (2014). Object-centered shifts of receptive field positions in monkey primary visual cortex, Curr. Biol.24, 1653–1658.
Polonsky A., BlakeR., BraunJ., HeegerD. J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry, Nat. Neurosci.3, 1153–1159.
PooresmaeiliA., ArrighiR., BiagiL., MorroneM. C. (2013). Blood oxygen level-dependent activation of the primary visual cortex predicts size adaptation illusion, J. Neurosci.33, 15999–16008.
PylyshynZ. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception, Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 341–365.
RiddochG. (1917). On the relative perceptions of movement and a stationary object in certain visual disturbances due to occipital injuries, Proc. R. Soc. Med. 10, 13–34.
RockI., KaufmanL. (1962). The moon illusion, II: the moon’s apparent size is a function of the presence or absence of terrain, Science22, 1023–1031.
ScholzJ., KleinM. C., BehrensT. E., Johansen-BergH. (2009). Training induces changes in white-matter architecture, Nat. Neurosci.12, 1370–1371.
SchwarzkopfD. S., SongC., ReesG. (2011). The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size, Nat. Neurosci.14, 28–30.
SerenoM. I., DaleA. M., ReppasJ. B., KwongK. K., BelliveauJ. W., BradyT. J., RosenB. R., Tootell R. B. (1995). Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, Science268, 889–893.
SergentC., BailletS., DehaeneS. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink, Nat. Neurosci.8, 1391–1400.
SerinoA., AlsmithA., CostantiniM., MandriginA., Tajadura-JimenezA., LopezC. (2013). Bodily ownership and self-location: components of bodily self-consciousness, Conscious. Cogn.22, 1239–1252.
SheinbergD. L., LogothetisN. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA94, 3408–3413.
SherringtonC. S. (1918). Observations on the sensual role of the proprioceptive nerve-supply of the extrinsic ocular muscles, Brain 41, 332–343.
SmithJ. D., MargE. (1975). Zoom neurons in visual cortex: receptive field enlargements with near fixation in monkeys, Experientia31, 323–326.
SperandioI., ChouinardP. A., GoodaleM. A. (2012c). Retinotopic activity in V1 reflects the perceived not the retinal size of an afterimage, Nat. Neurosci.15, 540–542.
SperandioI., KaderaliS., ChouinardP. A., FreyJ., GoodaleM. A. (2013a). Perceived size change induced by non-visual signals in darkness: the relative contribution of vergence and proprioception, J. Neurosci. 33, 16915–16923.
SperandioI., WhitwellR. L., ChouinardP. A., GoodaleM. A. (2013b). Dissociation between size constancy for perception and action in a patient with bilateral occipital lesions, Perception42(Supplement), 93.
TrotterY., CelebriniS., StricanneB., Thorpe S., ImbertM. (1992). Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance, Science257, 1279–1281.
TrotterY., CelebriniS., DurandJ. B. (2004). Evidence for implication of primate area V1 in neural 3-D spatial location processing, J. Physiol.98, 125–134.
UngerleiderL., GanzL., PribramK. H. (1977). Size constancy in rhesus monkeys: effects of pulvinar, prestriate, and inferotemporal lesions, Exp. Brain Res.27, 251–269.
Van der HoortB., EhrssonH. H. (2014). Body ownership affects visual perception of object size by rescaling the visual representation of external space, Atten. Percept. Psychophys.76, 1414–1428.
Van der HoortB., GuterstamA., EhrssonH. H. (2011). Being barbie: the size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world, PLoS One6(5), e20195.
WeidnerR., PlewanT., ChenQ., BuchnerA., WeissP. H., FinkG. R. (2014). The moon illusion and size–distance scaling — evidence for shared neural patterns, J. Cogn. Neurosci.26, 1871–1882.
WhitneyD., GoltzH. C., ThomasC. G., GatiJ. S., MenonR. S., Goodale M. A. (2003). Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex, Science302, 878–881.
WilkeM., LogothetisN. K., LeopoldD. A. (2006). Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 17507–17512.
What are the 3 types of perceptual constancy?Types of Perceptual Constancy: Shape, Size, and Brightness.
Is perceptual constancy the same as size constancy?the ability to perceive an object as being the same size despite the fact that the size of its retinal image changes depending on its distance from the observer. It is a type of perceptual constancy.
What is perceptual constancies and perceptual illusion?when the representation at the eye (retinal image) is variant with change in observer position, posture, and movement. These constancies are consequent on stimuli for object distance and observer posture and motion. When the retinal image is invariant and these stimuli are manipulated, perceptual illusions occur.
What term describes the perceptual process that makes an object appear to remain the same size despite changes in the size of the image it casts on the retina?Size constancy is the tendency to see objects as being of constant size regardless of the size of the retinal image. 2. Shape constancy refers to the perception that objects maintain their shape even though the retinal image they cast may change.
|
