So sánh gtx 750ti vs 1050 năm 2024
|
Nvidia vừa chính thức giới thiệu hai card đồ họa GeForce GTX 1050 và GeForce GTX 1050 Ti với giá vào khoảng 100-180$ tùy phiên bản. Mức giá này hứa hẹn sẽ cạnh tranh khá gay gắt với các card Radeon RX 460 và RX 470 của AMD. Theo công bố từ nVidia thì 1050 có hiệu năng gấp 3 lần so với GeForce GTX 650 , gấp rưỡi GTX 750 Ti, tức hiệu năng cải tiến rất đáng kể và cho phép chúng ta chơi hầu hết các game ở thời điểm hiện tại trên độ phân giải FullHD. Show
GTX 1050 Được tạo ra cho eSport và những game thủ muốn chơi các game nhẹ nhàng, GTX 1050 đủ sức gánh hàng loạt các game khá nặng như OverWatch, Gear Of Wars 4... khi đều đạt trên 60 khung hình mỗi giây. Với đối tượng khách hàng này thì sự tiện dụng là rất quan trọng nên 1050 và 1050 Ti đều không cần nguồn phụ, chỉ cần 75W là đủ. Dự kiến các card đồ họa này sẽ bán vào ngày 25/10, sẽ không có bản Founder. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores640640CUDA cores640640Core clock speed1290 MHz1020 MHzBoost clock speed1392 MHz1085 MHzNumber of transistors3,300 million1,870 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 WattMaximum GPU temperature97 °Cno dataTexture fill rate58.2043.40Floating-point performance1,862 gflops1,389 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)Height4.38" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)Width2-slot2-slotRecommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno dataSupplementary power connectorsNoneNoneSLI options-no dataSLI-no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed7008 MHz5.4 GB/sMemory bandwidth112 GB/s86.4 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIMulti monitor support+4 displaysHDMI++HDCP2.2+Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536G-SYNC support+no dataAudio input for HDMIno dataInternal TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3Dno data+3D Gamingno data+3D Visionno data+GameStream+no dataGPU Boost3.0no data3D Vision Liveno data+VR Ready+no dataAnsel+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)Shader Model6.45.1OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 30% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 30% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 50% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 59% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 58% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 31% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 48% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 59% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 36% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1050 outperforms 750 Ti by 63% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD45 50 1440p24 18−20 4K22 16−18 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207720−22 16−18 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey38 +81% 21−24 −81% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +40% 14−16 −40% Battlefield 556 +64.7% 30−35 −64.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare34 +25.9% 27−30 −25.9% Cyberpunk 207720−22 +25% 16−18 −25% Far Cry 530−35 +36% 24−27 −36% Far Cry New Dawn41 +51.9% 27−30 −51.9% Forza Horizon 445−50 +28.6% 35−40 −28.6% Hitman 335−40 +34.6% 24−27 −34.6% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 +35% 20−22 −35% Red Dead Redemption 231 +82.4% 16−18 −82.4% Shadow of the Tomb Raider27 +28.6% 21−24 −28.6% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +41.2% 16−18 −41.2% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey26 +23.8% 21−24 −23.8% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +40% 14−16 −40% Battlefield 543 +26.5% 30−35 −26.5% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare24 −12.5% 27−30 +12.5% Cyberpunk 207720−22 +25% 16−18 −25% Far Cry 530−35 +36% 24−27 −36% Far Cry New Dawn38 +40.7% 27−30 −40.7% Forza Horizon 449 +40% 35−40 −40% Hitman 335−40 +34.6% 24−27 −34.6% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 +35% 20−22 −35% Metro Exodus17 +13.3% 14−16 −13.3% Red Dead Redemption 29 −88.9% 16−18 +88.9% Shadow of the Tomb Raider24 +14.3% 21−24 −14.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt38 +81% 21−24 −81% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +41.2% 16−18 −41.2% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey15 −40% 21−24 +40% Assassin's Creed Valhalla21−24 +40% 14−16 −40% Battlefield 536 +5.9% 30−35 −5.9% Cyberpunk 207720−22 +25% 16−18 −25% Far Cry 530−35 +36% 24−27 −36% Far Cry New Dawn35 +29.6% 27−30 −29.6% Forza Horizon 434 −2.9% 35−40 +2.9% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt20 −5% 21−24 +5% Watch Dogs: Legion24−27 +41.2% 16−18 −41.2% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare18−20 +26.7% 14−16 −26.7% Hitman 320−22 +25% 16−18 −25% Horizon Zero Dawn18−20 +20% 14−16 −20% Metro Exodus10−12 +37.5% 8−9 −37.5% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +28.6% 7−8 −28.6% Shadow of the Tomb Raider16−18 +30.8% 12−14 −30.8% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey12−14 +44.4% 9−10 −44.4% Assassin's Creed Valhalla9−10 +80% 5−6 −80% Battlefield 527 +58.8% 16−18 −58.8% Cyberpunk 20777−8 +40% 5−6 −40% Far Cry 521−24 +31.3% 16−18 −31.3% Far Cry New Dawn25 +56.3% 16−18 −56.3% Forza Horizon 424−27 +41.2% 16−18 −41.2% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt14−16 +50% 10−11 −50% Watch Dogs: Legion7−8 +40% 5−6 −40% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare9−10 +28.6% 7−8 −28.6% Hitman 312−14 +33.3% 9−10 −33.3% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Metro Exodus6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +40% 5−6 −40% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 +40% 5−6 −40% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt15 +87.5% 8−9 −87.5% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey8−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Assassin's Creed Valhalla6−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Battlefield 512−14 +62.5% 8−9 −62.5% Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 510−11 +25% 8−9 −25% Far Cry New Dawn11 +0% 10−12 +0% Forza Horizon 416−18 +33.3% 12−14 −33.3% Watch Dogs: Legion5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% This is how GTX 1050 and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 13.04 10.06 Recency 25 October 2016 18 February 2014 Cost $109 $149 Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB Memory bandwidth 112 86.4 Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt The GeForce GTX 1050 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 750 Ti Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
