So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Hôm nay chúng ta sẽ đối mặt với tầm trung, RX 470 Vân vân GTX 1050 TiViết tắt là AMD vs Nvidia. Radeon RX 470 sẽ sẵn sàng cạnh tranh với GTX 1050 Ti sau một đợt giảm giá sắp được công bố. Cả hai thẻ đều nhắm mục tiêu những người chơi sau: 1080p, sử dụng trí nhớ của bạn 4GB. Trên thực tế, có một cái gì đó khác tương tự trên cả hai thẻ. Rõ ràng, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti sử dụng bộ xử lý đồ họa Pascal GP107 đã được thực hiện theo quy trình sau: FinFET 14nmCó cùng kích thước với GPU Polaris.

Hiện tại, chúng tôi chỉ có một biểu đồ trên trang sản phẩm GTX 1050 GTX Ti chính thức so sánh nó với GTX 750 Ti. So sánh này chỉ được thực hiện trong Overwatch, Gears of War 4 và GTA 5. Trong so sánh mới này, chúng ta có thể thấy hiệu suất của nó trong một vài tựa game nữa.

So sánh giữa RX 470 và GTX 1050 Ti

Trong hình ảnh dưới đây, chúng ta có thể thấy sự so sánh trong các trò chơi khác nhau của RX 470, GTX 1050 Ti OC và GTX 960 OC. So sánh này được thực hiện DirectX 11, DirectX 12 Y Vulcan.

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Như chúng ta có thể thấy, AMD Radeon RX 470 là điểm vượt trội hơn trong DirectX 12 khi đẩy bộ ngực của nó ra ngoài.

Trong hình bên dưới sự so sánh như sau: Chiến trường 1Là trò chơi mới nhất của DICE. Chúng ta có thể thấy hiệu suất của RX 470 vượt quá 1050 Ti.

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Chúng ta có thể xem các tính năng gặp phải ở đây. Một trong những điểm khác biệt lớn nhất là GTX 1050 Ti không cho phép. Crossfire / SLI. Điều này sẽ ngăn chúng tôi mua một hình ảnh khác và kết nối nó với của chúng tôi để cải thiện hiệu suất của nó.

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Cuối cùng, chúng ta có thể xem sơ đồ cách xếp hạng biểu đồ của cả hai công ty về sức mạnh.

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Kết quả cuộc so tài giữa RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti

Nói ngắn gọn AMD Radeon RX 470 chiến thắng long trời lở đất. Điều này phần lớn là Pascalkiến trúc của nó sử dụng tính toán không đồng bộ. Điều này cải thiện đáng kể hiệu suất của nó trong cả DirectX 12 và Vulkan. Việc RX 470 cho phép nhiều kết nối trên Crossfire cũng là một thực tế cần được tính đến. Cộng với công nghệ FreeSync AMD rẻ hơn nhiều so với G-Sync của Nvidia. Điều này sẽ cho phép chúng tôi tìm thấy màn hình có các tính năng này với mức giá chiết khấu.

Về giá cả, sau khi RX 470 được hạ xuống để hoàn toàn tương đương với GTX 1050 Ti, chúng khá ngang nhau. Nếu GTX 1050 cuối cùng đã phá vỡ giá quảng cáo, sự khác biệt sẽ không quá khoảng € 20. RX 470 sẽ là lựa chọn hấp dẫn nhất.

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768CUDA coresno data768Core clock speed926 MHz1291 MHzBoost clock speed1206 MHz1392 MHzNumber of transistors5,700 million3,300 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm16 nmPower consumption (TDP)120 Watt75 WattMaximum GPU temperatureno data97 °CTexture fill rate154.466.82Floating-point performance4,940 gflops2,138 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length241 mm145 mmWidth2-slot2-slotSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GBMemory bus width256 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed6600 MHz7008 MHzMemory bandwidth211.2 GB/s112 GB/sShared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortHDMI++G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no dataVR Readyno data+Anselno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL2.01.2Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon RX 470 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 28% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon RX 470 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 28% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon RX 470 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 86% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon RX 470 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 59% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon RX 470 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 34% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Radeon RX 470 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 8% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX 470 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 495 Mh/s 326 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 1.01 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 30 Mh/s 12.62 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.3 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 200 Sol/s 156.48 Sol/s

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70 51 1440p41 30 4K36 26

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 207730−35 24−27

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey40−45

−11.6%

48

+11.6%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla35−40

+32.1%

27−30

−32.1%

Battlefield 570−75

+11.1%

63

−11.1%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare50−55

+28.6%

40−45

−28.6%

Cyberpunk 207730−35

+30.8%

24−27

−30.8%

Far Cry 555−60

+27.9%

40−45

−27.9%

Far Cry New Dawn74

+54.2%

48

−54.2%

Forza Horizon 470−75

+2.9%

69

−2.9%

Hitman 360−65

+34.8%

45−50

−34.8%

Horizon Zero Dawn40−45

+29.4%

30−35

−29.4%

Red Dead Redemption 230−35

−2.9%

35

+2.9%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider45−50

+45.2%

31

−45.2%

Watch Dogs: Legion40−45

+29%

30−35

−29%

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey40−45

+7.5%

40

−7.5%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla35−40

+32.1%

27−30

−32.1%

Battlefield 570−75

+34.6%

52

−34.6%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare50−55

+38.5%

39

−38.5%

Cyberpunk 207730−35

+30.8%

24−27

−30.8%

Far Cry 555−60

+27.9%

40−45

−27.9%

Far Cry New Dawn68

+51.1%

45

−51.1%

Forza Horizon 470−75

+10.9%

64

−10.9%

Hitman 360−65

+34.8%

45−50

−34.8%

Horizon Zero Dawn40−45

+29.4%

30−35

−29.4%

Metro Exodus30−35

+30.8%

26

−30.8%

Red Dead Redemption 230−35

+88.9%

18

−88.9%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider45−50

+66.7%

27

−66.7%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt70

+42.9%

49

−42.9%

Watch Dogs: Legion40−45

+29%

30−35

−29%

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey40−45

+79.2%

24

−79.2%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla35−40

+32.1%

27−30

−32.1%

Battlefield 570−75

+37.3%

51

−37.3%

Cyberpunk 207730−35

+30.8%

24−27

−30.8%

Far Cry 561

+69.4%

36

−69.4%

Far Cry New Dawn63

+53.7%

41

−53.7%

Forza Horizon 470−75

+57.8%

45

−57.8%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt40

+53.8%

26

−53.8%

Watch Dogs: Legion40−45

+29%

30−35

−29%

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−35

+29.2%

24

−29.2%

Hitman 330−35

+30.8%

24−27

−30.8%

Horizon Zero Dawn27−30

+27.3%

21−24

−27.3%

Metro Exodus20−22

+33.3%

14−16

−33.3%

Red Dead Redemption 216−18

+33.3%

12−14

−33.3%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider27−30

+28.6%

21−24

−28.6%

1440p Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24

+35.3%

16−18

−35.3%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla20−22

+42.9%

14−16

−42.9%

Battlefield 545−50

+30.6%

36

−30.6%

Cyberpunk 207712−14

+33.3%

9−10

−33.3%

Far Cry 543

+59.3%

27−30

−59.3%

Far Cry New Dawn46

+58.6%

29

−58.6%

Forza Horizon 440−45

+31.3%

30−35

−31.3%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24

+35.3%

16−18

−35.3%

Watch Dogs: Legion14−16

+36.4%

10−12

−36.4%

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18

+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

Hitman 318−20

+26.7%

14−16

−26.7%

Horizon Zero Dawn14−16

+16.7%

12−14

−16.7%

Metro Exodus12−14

+33.3%

9

−33.3%

Red Dead Redemption 210−12

+22.2%

9−10

−22.2%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider14−16

+40%

10−11

−40%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24

+37.5%

16−18

−37.5%

4K Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey12−14

+30%

10−11

−30%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla10−12

+37.5%

8−9

−37.5%

Battlefield 524−27

+33.3%

18

−33.3%

Cyberpunk 20774−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Far Cry 516−18

+30.8%

12−14

−30.8%

Far Cry New Dawn24

+71.4%

14

−71.4%

Forza Horizon 427−30

+40%

20

−40%

Watch Dogs: Legion9−10

+28.6%

7−8

−28.6%


This is how RX 470 and GTX 1050 Ti compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 470 is 37.3% faster than GTX 1050 Ti

1440p resolution:

  • RX 470 is 36.7% faster than GTX 1050 Ti

4K resolution:

  • RX 470 is 38.5% faster than GTX 1050 Ti

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 470 is 88.9% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 11.6% faster than the RX 470.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 470 is ahead in 66 tests (97%)
  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.84 16.24 Recency 4 August 2016 25 October 2016 Cost $179 $139 Memory bus width 256 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 2048 768 Memory bandwidth 211.2 112 Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Radeon RX 470

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate AMD Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

So sánh gtx 1050ti và rx470

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.