So sánh gt 710 và gt 730 năm 2024

Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng máy tính để bàn: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 730 và 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 710 OEM để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v.

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296CUDA cores192no dataCore clock speed954 MHz700 MHzNumber of transistors915 million585 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)19 Watt49 WattMaximum GPU temperature95 °Cno dataTexture fill rate15.2611.2 GT/sFloating-point performance366.3 gflops268.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no dataInterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)145 mmHeight2.713" (6.9 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width64 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed1.8 GB/s1800 MHzMemory bandwidth14.4 GB/s25.6 GB/sShared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAMulti monitor support3 displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+no dataPureVideo+no dataPhysX+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 32% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 32% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 24% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 51% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 88% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 77% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 730 outperforms GT 710 by 67% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8 10−12 1440p3

+0%

3−4

+0%

4K7 9−10

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 20774−5 5−6

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Battlefield 51−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−11

−20%

12−14

+20%

Cyberpunk 20774−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Far Cry 55

−20%

6−7

+20%

Far Cry New Dawn5

−20%

6−7

+20%

Forza Horizon 44−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Hitman 35

−20%

6−7

+20%

Horizon Zero Dawn1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 24−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8

−28.6%

9−10

+28.6%

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Battlefield 51−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−11

−20%

12−14

+20%

Cyberpunk 20774−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Far Cry 54

−25%

5−6

+25%

Far Cry New Dawn5

−20%

6−7

+20%

Forza Horizon 44−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Hitman 32−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Horizon Zero Dawn1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Metro Exodus3

+0%

3−4

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 24−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8

−28.6%

9−10

+28.6%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt5

−20%

6−7

+20%

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Battlefield 51−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Cyberpunk 20774−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Far Cry 54

−25%

5−6

+25%

Forza Horizon 44−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3

+0%

3−4

+0%

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare4−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Hitman 34−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

Horizon Zero Dawn8−9

−25%

10−11

+25%

Red Dead Redemption 20−1 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider4−5

−25%

5−6

+25%

1440p Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 20771−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Far Cry 52−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Hitman 32−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Horizon Zero Dawn6−7

−16.7%

7−8

+16.7%

Red Dead Redemption 20−1 0−1

4K Ultra Preset

Far Cry 53−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Far Cry New Dawn5−6 6−7 Forza Horizon 41−2

+0%

1−2

+0%


This is how GT 710 and GT 730 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GT 730 is 25% faster than GT 710

1440p resolution:

  • GT 730 is 0% faster than GT 710

4K resolution:

  • GT 730 is 28.6% faster than GT 710

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.63 2.15 Recency 27 March 2014 18 June 2014 Cost $34.99 $59.99 Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 49 Watt

The GeForce GT 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


GeForce GT 710

GeForce GT 730

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh gt 710 và gt 730 năm 2024

So sánh gt 710 và gt 730 năm 2024

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh gt 710 và gt 730 năm 2024

So sánh gt 710 và gt 730 năm 2024

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.