What is the difference between projective tests and personality inventories?

The objective test requires the respondent to make a particular response to a structured set of instructions [e.g., true/false, yes/no, or the correct answer]. The projective test is given in an ambiguous context in order to afford the respondent an opportunity to impose his or her own interpretation in answering.

How are objective personality tests different from projective personality tests quizlet?

Objective: clear and unambiguous questions, stimuli, or techniques for measuring personality traits. Projective: ambiguous or unclear stimuli which the test taker is asked to interpret or impost meaning upon.

What are projective personality tests?

In psychology, a projective test is a personality test designed to let a person respond to ambiguous stimuli, presumably revealing hidden emotions and internal conflicts projected by the person into the test.

What are the different personality inventories?

Commonly used personality tests include the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator [MBTI], the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory [MMPI], and the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire

In order to study and measure personality, regardless of theoretical orientation, methods of assessing personality variables are necessary. There are today literally hundreds of different tests available for psychologists to use in assessing personality differences. The tests vary from objective self-report questionnaires to tests which emphasize personal style and expression. Techniques such as inkblots, story telling, figure drawings, play construction, reactions to humor, adjective descriptions, and role playing have all been used as means by which to gather information about an individual’s personality makeup.

Keywords

  • Personality Inventory
  • Projective Measure
  • Projective Technique
  • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
  • Comprehensive System

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter

EUR   29.95

Price includes VAT [Singapore]
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0554-3_11
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Chapter

eBookEUR   64.19Price includes VAT [Singapore]

  • ISBN: 978-1-4899-0554-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy eBook

Softcover BookEUR   74.99Price excludes VAT [Singapore]

  • ISBN: 978-1-4899-0556-7
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Softcover Book

Hardcover BookEUR   109.99Price excludes VAT [Singapore]

  • ISBN: 978-0-306-42244-7
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Hardcover Book

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hammer EF: The Clinical Application of Projective Drawings. Springfield, Charles C Thomas, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koppitz E: Psychological Evaluation of Children’s Human Figure Dräwings. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodenough F: Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings. New York, World Book Company, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Machover K: Personality Projection in the Drawing of a Human Figure. Springfield, Charles C Thomas, 1949.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Buck JN: The H—T—P technique, a quantitative and qualitative scoring method. J Clinical Psychology Monograph No. 5: 1–120, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DiLeo JH: Child Development: Analysis and Synthesis. New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rotter JB, Rafferty, JE: The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank. New York, Psychological Corp., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rohde AR: The Sentence Completion Method: Its Diagnostic and Clinical Application to Mental Disorders. New York, Ronald, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer JO: The Psychological Assessment of Children. New York, John Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cofer CN: Review of the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank, in Buros OK [ed]: Fourth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1953,p 130.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schofield W: Review of the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank, in Buros OK [ed]: Fourth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1953,p 131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murray HA: Thematic Apperception Test. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bellak L, Bellak S: Children’s Apperception Test. New York, C.P.S. Co., 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bellak L, Bellak S: A Human Version of the C.A.T. New York, C.P.S. Co., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anastasi A: Psychological Testing, ed 2. New York, Macmillan, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wirt D: Review of the C.A.T., in Buros OK [ed]: Sixth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1965, p 206.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bellak L: The T.A.T. and C.A.T. in Clinical Use. New York, Grune and Stratton Inc, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rorschach H: Rorschach Psychodiagnostic. Bern, Switzerland, Hans Huber Medical Publisher, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Exner JE Jr: The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Exner JE Jr: The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, II: Current Research and Advanced Interpretations. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Exner JE Jr, Weiner IB: The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, III: Assessment of Children and Adolescents. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Halpern FA: Clinical Approach to Children’s Rorschachs. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ames LB, Metraux RW, Rodell JL, Walker RN: Child Rorschach Responses: Developmental Trends from Two to Ten Years. New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ames LB, Metraux RW, Walker RN: Adolescent Rorschach Responses: Developmental Trends from Ten to Sixteen Years. New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zubin J, Eron L, Schumer F: An Experimental Approach to Projective Techniques. New York, Wiley, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aronow E, Reznikoff M: Rorschach Content Interpretation. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hathaway SR, Meehl PE: An Atlas for the Clinical Use of the MMPI. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alker HA: Review of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, in Buros OK [ed]: Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook, vol 1. Highland Park, New Jersey, Gryphon Press, 1978, p 931.

    Google Scholar 

  29. King GD: Review of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, in Buros OK [ed]: Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook, vol 1. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1978, p 935.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hathaway SR, McKinley JC: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Manual, rev. New York, Psychological Corporation, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dahlstrom, WG, Welsh, CS, Dahlstrom, LE: An MMPI Handbook, rev ed, I, Clinical Interpretation. Minneapolis, MI, University of Minnesota Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cottle WC: Card versus booklet forms for the MMPI. J Applied Psychology 34: 255, 1950.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, White Plains, New York, USA

    Stewart Gabel M.D.

  2. Regional Institute for Children and Adolescents [RICA], Rockville, Maryland, USA

    Gerald D. Oster Ph.D.

  3. Independent Practice, Richmond, Virginia, USA

    Steven M. Butnik Ph.D.

Authors

  1. Stewart Gabel M.D.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerald D. Oster Ph.D.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven M. Butnik Ph.D.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabel, S., Oster, G.D., Butnik, S.M. [1986]. Personality Inventories and Projective Measures. In: Understanding Psychological Testing in Children. Springer, Boston, MA. //doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0554-3_11

What is the difference between test and inventory in psychology?

The term “test” most frequently refers to devices for measuring abilities or qualities for which there are authoritative right and wrong answers. Such a test may be contrasted with a personality inventory, for which it is often claimed that there are no right or wrong answers.

What is the difference between projective and objective measures of personality?

Objective tests involve standardized test questions that are scored and analyzed. Projective tests require test-takers to interpret ambiguous stimuli.

What is difference between personality test and projective test?

Correct answer: The key difference between projective and objective personality tests is the way they are scored. Objective tests, which often involve self-report methods and “true/false” or multiple choice questions, are scored in a standardized, predetermined way.

What is the difference between the self

Describe each type of personality assessment self-report inventories and projective tests. In self-report inventories, people answer several questions about their own behaviors. In projective tests, people respond to pictures and inkblots that can reveal information about their needs, feelings, and personality traits.

Chủ Đề