So sánh rx 470 và rx480 năm 2024
|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores20482304Compute unitsno data36Core clock speed926 MHz1120 MHzBoost clock speed1206 MHz1266 MHzNumber of transistors5,700 million5,700 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)120 Watt150 WattTexture fill rate154.4182.3Floating-point performance4,940 gflops5,834 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportno datan/aInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length241 mm241 mmWidth2-slot2-slotSupplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pinBridgeless CrossFireno data1 MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GBMemory bus width256 Bit256 BitMemory clock speed6600 MHz8000 MHzMemory bandwidth211.2 GB/s224 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortEyefinityno data1HDMI+2.0DisplayPort supportno data1.4HDR TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. AppAccelerationno datan/aCrossFireno data1Endurono datan/aFRTCno data1FreeSync++HD3Dno datan/aLiquidVRno data1PowerTuneno data+TressFXno data1TrueAudiono datan/aZeroCoreno data+UVDno data+VCEno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX® 12Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.5OpenCL2.02.0Vulkan1.2.131+Mantleno datan/a Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. RX 480 outperforms RX 470 by 7% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% RX 480 outperforms RX 470 by 7% in Passmark. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% RX 480 outperforms RX 470 by 2% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% RX 480 outperforms RX 470 by 3% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% RX 480 outperforms RX 470 by 5% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% RX 480 outperforms RX 470 by 1% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD70 78 1440p41 54 4K36 35 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207730−35 35−40 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey40−45 −38.1% 58 +38.1% Assassin's Creed Valhalla35−40 −8.1% 40−45 +8.1% Battlefield 570−75 −5.7% 70−75 +5.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare50−55 −7.4% 55−60 +7.4% Cyberpunk 207730−35 −9.1% 35−40 +9.1% Far Cry 555−60 −7.3% 55−60 +7.3% Far Cry New Dawn74 +25.4% 55−60 −25.4% Forza Horizon 470−75 −42.9% 100 +42.9% Hitman 360−65 −8.2% 65−70 +8.2% Horizon Zero Dawn40−45 −6.8% 45−50 +6.8% Red Dead Redemption 230−35 −103% 69 +103% Shadow of the Tomb Raider45−50 −46.7% 66 +46.7% Watch Dogs: Legion40−45 −7.5% 40−45 +7.5% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey40−45 −16.7% 49 +16.7% Assassin's Creed Valhalla35−40 −8.1% 40−45 +8.1% Battlefield 570−75 −5.7% 70−75 +5.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare50−55 +54.3% 35 −54.3% Cyberpunk 207730−35 −9.1% 35−40 +9.1% Far Cry 555−60 −7.3% 55−60 +7.3% Far Cry New Dawn68 +15.3% 55−60 −15.3% Forza Horizon 470−75 −32.9% 93 +32.9% Hitman 360−65 −8.2% 65−70 +8.2% Horizon Zero Dawn40−45 −6.8% 45−50 +6.8% Metro Exodus30−35 −20.6% 41 +20.6% Red Dead Redemption 230−35 +0% 34 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider45−50 −26.7% 57 +26.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt70 −11.4% 78 +11.4% Watch Dogs: Legion40−45 −7.5% 40−45 +7.5% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey40−45 +20% 35 −20% Assassin's Creed Valhalla35−40 −8.1% 40−45 +8.1% Battlefield 570−75 −5.7% 70−75 +5.7% Cyberpunk 207730−35 −9.1% 35−40 +9.1% Far Cry 561 +3.4% 55−60 −3.4% Far Cry New Dawn63 −9.5% 69 +9.5% Forza Horizon 470−75 −10% 77 +10% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt40 −10% 44 +10% Watch Dogs: Legion40−45 −7.5% 40−45 +7.5% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−35 −9.7% 30−35 +9.7% Hitman 330−35 −8.8% 35−40 +8.8% Horizon Zero Dawn27−30 −7.1% 30−33 +7.1% Metro Exodus20−22 −10% 21−24 +10% Red Dead Redemption 216−18 −31.3% 21 +31.3% Shadow of the Tomb Raider27−30 −7.4% 27−30 +7.4% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey21−24 −4.3% 24−27 +4.3% Assassin's Creed Valhalla20−22 −10% 21−24 +10% Battlefield 545−50 −8.7% 50−55 +8.7% Cyberpunk 207712−14 −16.7% 14−16 +16.7% Far Cry 543 +13.2% 35−40 −13.2% Far Cry New Dawn46 −8.7% 50 +8.7% Forza Horizon 440−45 −7.3% 40−45 +7.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt27−30 −7.4% 27−30 +7.4% Watch Dogs: Legion14−16 −6.7% 16−18 +6.7% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18 −6.3% 16−18 +6.3% Hitman 318−20 −10.5% 21−24 +10.5% Horizon Zero Dawn14−16 −7.1% 14−16 +7.1% Metro Exodus12−14 −25% 15 +25% Red Dead Redemption 210−12 −9.1% 12−14 +9.1% Shadow of the Tomb Raider14−16 −28.6% 18 +28.6% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24 −22.7% 27 +22.7% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey12−14 −30.8% 17 +30.8% Assassin's Creed Valhalla10−12 −9.1% 12−14 +9.1% Battlefield 524−27 −8.3% 24−27 +8.3% Cyberpunk 20774−5 −25% 5−6 +25% Far Cry 516−18 −5.9% 18−20 +5.9% Far Cry New Dawn24 −8.3% 26 +8.3% Forza Horizon 427−30 −7.4% 27−30 +7.4% Watch Dogs: Legion9−10 −11.1% 10−11 +11.1% This is how RX 470 and RX 480 compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 20.88 22.28 Recency 4 August 2016 29 June 2016 Cost $179 $229 Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 150 Watt We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 470 and Radeon RX 480. The differences in performance seem too small. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. User ratingsDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Radeon RX 470 Radeon RX 480 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate AMD Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate AMD Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
