So sánh chip mediatek và exynos năm 2024

Samsung đã giới thiệu bộ xử lý di động hàng đầu mới nhất của mình, Exynos 2400, vào năm 2024. Bộ xử lý này được xây dựng trên tiến trình 4nm của Samsung và sử dụng kiến trúc RDNA 3 của AMD cho GPU.

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 850 (with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G35 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators

CPU Performance

Single and multi-core processor tests

Gaming Performance

GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan

Battery life

Efficiency of battery consumption

NanoReview Score

Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip

Pros of Samsung Exynos 850

• Has a smaller size transistor (8 versus 12 nm)
• Higher GPU frequency (~25%)
• Shows better (up to 25%) AnTuTu 10 score – 185K vs 148K

Pros of MediaTek Helio G35

• 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios

CPU 64990 53638 GPU 26753 17950 Memory 54180 40805 UX 39451 36303 Total score 185179 148377

Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Asset compression 53.9 MB/sec 63.1 MB/sec HTML 5 Browser 31.7 pages/sec 25.9 pages/sec PDF Renderer 35.9 Mpixels/sec 36.1 Mpixels/sec Image detection 8.03 images/sec 10.5 images/sec HDR 29.7 Mpixels/sec 30 Mpixels/sec Background blur 1.53 images/sec 0.87 images/sec Photo processing 8.04 images/sec 7.57 images/sec Ray tracing 1.52 Mpixels/sec 1.65 Mpixels/sec

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Stability 98% - Graphics test 2 FPS - Score 425 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile - 23 FPS [Low] Call of Duty: Mobile - 29 FPS [Medium] Shadowgun Legends - 30 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz - 43 FPS [Low] Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 29 FPS [Low] Device - Xiaomi Poco C3 720 x 1600

We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 850 and Helio G35

CPU

Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2000 MHz 2300 MHz Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A Process 8 nanometers 12 nanometers TDP 3 W 2.2 W Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 PowerVR GE8320 Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) GPU frequency 850 MHz 680 MHz Execution units 1 4 Shading units 24 8 Total shaders 24 32 FLOPS 40.8 Gigaflops 43.5 Gigaflops Vulkan version 1.3 1.1 OpenCL version 2.0 1.2

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1600 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit Max bandwidth - 13.9 Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No No Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1 Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2400 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 25MP, 2x 13MP Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 30FPS Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 7 5G support No No Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth 5.0 5.0 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?

Related Comparisons

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G35 and Exynos 850, or ask any questions