Face processing is especially dependent on the __________.

Recognition is the ability to perceive the physical characteristics of objects (including faces and non-face objects) and categorize these characteristics into classes (e.g., size, shape, color), in order to apply a semantic label to the object (e.g., “coffee cup”) or identify the face (e.g., “Jim from the office”).

Introduction

Human vision evolved to support two distinct mechanisms: recognition of objects and visual guidance of movement. As such, visual processing is instantiated in the brain by way of two distinct visual pathways that both originate in primary visual cortex (V1) and project to the temporal (ventral stream) or parietal (dorsal stream) cortex (Kravitz et al. 2013). The distinction between these two pathways has been demonstrated in case studies, showing that patients with lesions in the ventral stream nevertheless demonstrate the ability to appropriately reach and grasp...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter

EUR   29.95

Price includes VAT (Singapore)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2762
  • Chapter length: 8 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Chapter

eBookEUR   4,279.99Price includes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-3-319-19650-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy eBook

Hardcover BookEUR   4,499.99Price excludes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-3-319-19649-7
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Hardcover Book

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P., & Bergstrom, B. (2011). Threat-detection in child development: An evolutionary perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.010.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caldara, R., Seghier, M. L., Rossion, B., Lazeyras, F., Michel, C., & Hauert, C.-A. (2006). The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part. NeuroImage, 31(1), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.011.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012). How does the brain solve visual object recognition? Neuron, 73(3), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., McGugin, R. W., Richler, J. J., Herzmann, G., Speegle, M., & Gulick, A. E. (2014). Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349(6305), 154–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/349154a0.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. J., & Phillips, M. L. (2004). Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.006.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, P. J., & Lewis, M. B. (2018). The development of face expertise: Evidence for a qualitative change in processing. Cognitive Development, 48, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.05.003.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, M., Müller, A., & Rentschler, I. (2006). A developmental dissociation of view-dependent and view-invariant object recognition in adolescence. Behavioural Brain Research, 175(2), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.09.005.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, M., Wakui, E., Petters, D., Kaur, S., & Davidoff, J. (2013). Developmental trajectories of part-based and configural object recognition in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027707.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (2013). The ventral visual pathway: An expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.011.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macchi, C., Turati, C., & Simion, F. (2004). Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ face preference? Psychological Science, 15(6), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00688.x.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.90.3.215.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McGugin, R. W., Ryan, K. F., Tamber-Rosenau, B. J., & Gauthier, I. (2018). The role of experience in the face-selective response in right FFA. Cerebral Cortex, 28(6), 2071–2084. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx113.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.164.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motta-Mena, N. V., & Puts, D. A. (2017). Endocrinology of human female sexuality, mating, and reproductive behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.012.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant & Child Development, 10(1–2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.239.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, L. A. (2011). The evolution of face processing in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1764–1777. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0358.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037004.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., Humphreys, K., & Luna, B. (2007). Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. Developmental Science, 10(4), F15–F30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00595.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shakeshaft, N. G., & Plomin, R. (2015). Genetic specificity of face recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(41), 12887–12892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421881112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, F. A., & Wasserman, E. A. (2014). Mechanisms of object recognition: What we have learned from pigeons. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00122.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. W., & Simonyi, D. (2015). The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: A review of the literature. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10), 1876–1889. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, E. A., Uyl, J. D., Dwortz, M., & McLean, C. (2019). The development and evolution of specialized face learning in paper wasps. Animal Behaviour, 147, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.10.016.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2008). Mechanisms of face perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31(1), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Turati, C., Valenza, E., Leo, I., & Simion, F. (2005). Three-month-olds’ visual preference for faces and its underlying visual processing mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.001.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yovel, G., & Freiwald, W. A. (2013). Face recognition systems in monkey and human: Are they the same thing? F1000Prime Reports, 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.12703/p5-10.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Jason W Griffin & Natalie V Motta-Mena

  2. Human Factors, Exponent, Inc, Austin, TX, USA

    Natalie V Motta-Mena

  3. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Natalie V Motta-Mena

Authors

  1. Jason W Griffin

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalie V Motta-Mena

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie V Motta-Mena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA

    Todd K Shackelford

  2. Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA

    Viviana A Weekes-Shackelford

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Griffin, J.W., Motta-Mena, N.V. (2021). Face and Object Recognition. In: Shackelford, T.K., Weekes-Shackelford, V.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2762

What part of the brain is responsible for face processing?

The ability to recognize faces is so important in humans that the brain appears to have an area solely devoted to the task: the fusiform gyrus. Brain imaging studies consistently find that this region of the temporal lobe becomes active when people look at faces.

What is face processing in psychology?

The face module appears to process images differently from the general object system: Face processing is holistic, in the sense that we cannot process individual face parts without being influenced by the whole face. We suggest that this difference arises early in the face module.

What factors affect facial recognition?

Factors Affecting Face Recognition Performance.
Face direction. The face looks directly at the camera, and is not overly rotated..
Face size. The face forms a large proportion of the image..
Facial features. Facial expression, facial hair, and presence of spectacles match the training image as closely as possible..

How does face perception develop?

One of the most widely accepted theories of face perception argues that understanding faces involves several stages: from basic perceptual manipulations on the sensory information to derive details about the person (such as age, gender or attractiveness), to being able to recall meaningful details such as their name ...