Analyzing and interpreting data from likert type scales journal of graduate medical education

All research outputs

#814,797

of 21,840,504 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Graduate Medical Education

#102

of 1,729 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#16,381

of 373,221 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Graduate Medical Education

#4

of 32 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 21,840,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.

Article citationsMore>>

Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr., H. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-Type Scales. The Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5, 541-542.
https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Empirical Evidence for a New Class of Personality Disorder: The Safety-Oriented Personality Style or Phobicentric Psychopathology (SOPS/PCP) and Impact on Personality Psychology

  AUTHORS: Patrick Bickersteth, Xinxin Zhang, Qi Guo

  KEYWORDS: Fear-Anxiety, Big 5, DSM, Emotion-Based, Contemporary Integrative Interpersonal Theory, Interpersonal Relatedness & Self-Definition

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.9 No.7, July 10, 2018

  ABSTRACT: This study is aimed at establishing that the Safety-Oriented Personality Style (SOPS) or Phobicentric Psychopathology (PCP) is an actual mental disorder representing a disproportionate, self-focused pattern of reacting to ordinary fear-anxiety situations. SOPS/PCP is most similar to Neuroticism in the widely accepted Big 5 model. The presentation of personality within a dimensional structure is in contradistinction to that of the lately criticized category-based Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). Nonetheless contrasting both Big 5 and DSM, a neuro-biological theory provided the SOPS/PCP construct with etiological capability to empirically explain progress of the condition from normal to dysfunctional functioning, thus linking it with day-to-day emotional life. From a sample of 406 adults, who participated in confirming respectively that SOPS/PCP is present outside the clinical setting and is a real-world empirical condition, 100 individuals were randomly selected to examine the reliability and validity of the SOPS/PCP Individual Questionnaire (SOPSIQ). The results confirmed SOPS/PCP is an actual mental disorder, which is absent in some people and supported all the hypotheses in relation to the research objectives. In rivalry with three prominent formulations of personality, DSM, Big 5 and Interpersonal Relatedness & Self-Definition (IR), which is related to Contemporary Integrative Interpersonal Theory (CIIT), that of SOPS/PCP is presented as aspiring to be a more accurate elucidation of personality. Implications discussed also include suggesting DSM’s new categorical-dimensional platform is fatally flawed and questioning the investigative legitimacy of both the Big 5 and IR/CIIT. Among other ideas, it is suggested that SOPS/PCP might provide Big 5 with a presumptive etiological base; and that the behavior-to-theory approach of SOPS/PCP would be more research-friendly than the theory-to-behavior orientation prevalent in personality research. By describing personality functioning and its supporting theory as emotion-rooted this study recommends such a perspective makes it more practical to reliably define, track and eventually treat personality disorders.

Related Articles:

• Nam S. Vo, Thomas R. Sutter, Vinhthuy Phan

• L. Bourikas, T. Shen, P. A. B. James, D. H. C. Chow, M. F. Jentsch, J. Darkwa, A. S. Bahaj

• Israa Abdul Jabbar Ibrahim, Tuqa Abdul Kareem Hameed

• Jingjin Tian, Qian Zhang

• Abdel Kader Traoré, Assétou Soukho Kaya, Djibril Sy, Djenebou Traoré, Alassane Doumbia, Ilo Diall, Nangou Tolo, Hadiza Amadou Kaïlou, Karim Dao, Boua Daou Camara, Ganda Soumaré, Mamadou Dembélé, Hamar Alassane Traoré

How do you analyze Likert scale data?

How do you interpret Likert scale data for correlation analysis?

How do you read a 5 point Likert scale?

What statistical test do you use for Likert scale?