A Concise Introduction to Logic
12th EditionPatrick J. Hurley
1,933 solutions
Myers' Psychology for AP
2nd EditionDavid G Myers
900 solutions
Psychology
1st EditionHOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
1,007 solutions
A Concise Introduction to Logic
13th EditionLori Watson, Patrick J. Hurley
1,967 solutions
References
Algom, D. & Cohen-Raz, L. [1984] Visual velocity input-output functions: The integration of distance and duration into subjective velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10:486–501. [JA]Google ScholarPubMed
Algom, D. & Marks, L. E. [1984] Individual differences in loudness processing and loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology [General] 113:571–93. [aLEK, BS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. R. [1976] Language, memory, and thought. Erlbaum. [LMW]Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [1970] Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. Psychological Review 77:153–70. [aLEK, WJM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. H. [1972] Cross-task validation of functional measurement. Perception & Psychophysics 12:389–95. [aLEK, NHA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [1974] Cross-task validation of functional measurement using judgments of total magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102:226–33. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [1974a] Algebraic models in perception. In: Handbook of perception, vol. 2: Psychophysical judgment and measurement, ed. Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P.. Academic Press. [DDD]Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [1977] Failure of additivity in bisection of length. Perception & Psychophysics 22:213–22. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [1981] Foundations of information integration theory. Academic Press. [NHA]Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [1982] Methods of information integration theory. Academic Press. [NHA]Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H. [in press] Integration psychophysics. In. Proceedings of the 1987 Fechner Symposium, Leipzig, ed. Geissler, H.-G.. [NHA]Google Scholar
Attneave, F. [1962] Perception and related areas. In: Psychology: A study of a science, vol. 4, ed. Koch, S.. McGraw-Hill. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Attneave, F. [1972] The representation of physical space. In: Coding processes in human memory, ed. Melton, A. W. & Martin, E.. V. H. Winston. [RNS]Google Scholar
Attneave, F. & Olson, R. K. [1971] Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology 84:147–66. [RNS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auerbach, C. [1971] Interdependence of Stevens' exponents and discriminability measures. Psychological Review 78:556. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, C. [1973] A note on cross-modality matching. Quarterly Journal of Psychology 25:492–95. [aLEK]Google ScholarPubMed
Baird, J. C. [1970] A cognitive theory of psychophysics, II: Fechner's law and Stevens' law. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 11:89–102. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, J. C. [1970a] Psychophysical analysis of visual space. Pergamon. [JA]Google Scholar
Baird, J. C. [1975a] Psychophysical study of numbers, IV: Generalized preferred state theory. Psychological Research 38.175–87. [aLEK, JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C. [1975b] Psychophysical study of numbers, V. Preferred state theory of matching functions. Psychological Research 38:189–207. [aLEK, JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C., Green, D. M. & Luce, R. D. [1980] Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6:227–89. [DL]Google ScholarPubMed
Baird, J. C., Kreindler, M. & Jones, K. [1971] Generation of multiple ratio scales with a fixed stimulus attribute. Perception & Psychophysics 9:399–403. [rLEK, JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C., Lewis, C. & Romer, D. [1970] Relative frequencies of numerical responses in ratio estimation. Perception & Psychophysics 8:358–62. [JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C., Merrill, A. A. & Tannenbaum, J. [1979] Cognitive representation of spatial relations, II: A familiar environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology [General] 108:92–98. [JCB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, J. C. & Noma, E. [1975] Psychophysical study of numbers, I: Generation of numerical response. Psychological Research 37.281–97. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C. & Noma, E. [1978] Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Wiley. [arLEK, MW]Google Scholar
Baird, J. C., Romer, D. & Stein, T. [1970] Test of a cognitive theory of psychophysics: Size discrimination. Perceptual and Motor Skills 30:495–501. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, J. C. & Stein, T. [1970] When power functions fail: A theoretical explanation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 30:415–425. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C. & Szilagyi, P. [1977] Perception of psychophysical experiments, II: Model of scale values. Psychological Research 39:325–43. [JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C., Wagner, M. & Noma, E. [1982] Impossible cognitive spaces. Geographical Analysis 14:204–16. [rLEK, JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, J. C., Weissman, S. M. & McHugo, G. [1977] Perception of psychophysical experiments, I: Scaling of methods. Psychological Research 39:311–23. [JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, W. P. & Coleman, M. J. [1981] Two subjective scales of number. Perception & Psychophysics 29:95–105. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, W. P. & Hill, D. K. [1974] The apparent magnitude of number scaled by random production. Journal of Experimental Psychology [Monograph] 102:353–76. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R. B. Jr, Snodderly, D. M. & Swadlow, H. A. [1978] Intensity coding in primate visual system. Experimental Brain Research 31.163–77. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, J. & Shaw, W. A. [1967] Ratio-estimations of loudness intervals. American Journal of Psychology 80:59–65. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernoulli, D. [1954/1738] Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Translated from the Latin by Sommer, L.. Econometrika 22:23–36. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimbaum, M. H. [1974] Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical laws. Perception & Psychophysics 15:89–96. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimbaum, M. H. [1978] Differences and ratios in psychological measurement. In: Cognitive theory, vol. 3, ed. Castellan, N. J. & Restle, F.. Erlbaum. [MHB]Google Scholar
Bimbaum, M. H. [1980] Comparison of two theories of “ratio” and “difference” judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology [General] 109:304–19. [aLEK, MHB, ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimbaum, M. H. [1982] Controversies in psychological measurement. In: Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Erlbaum. [arLEK, MHB]Google Scholar
Bimbaum, M. H. & Elmasian, R. [1977] Loudness “ratios” and “differences” involve the same psychophysical operation. Perception & Psychophysics 22:383–91. [MHB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H. & Mellers, B. A. [1980] Context effects in category rating and magnitude estimation. Unpublished manuscript. Reported in M. H. Birnbaum [1982] Controversies in psychological measurement. In: Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement, ed. B. Wegener. Erlbaum. [JCB]Google Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H. & Veit, C. T. [1974] Scale-free tests of an additive model for the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 16:276–82. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H. & Veit, C. T. [1974a] Scale convergence as a criterion for rescaling: Information integration with difference, ratio, and averaging tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 15:7–15. [MHB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, D. A. & Anderson, N. H. [1976] Subjective duration: A functional measurement analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 20:168–72. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, G., Diamant, H., Strom, L. & Zotterman, Y. [1967] The relation between neural and perceptual intensity: A comparative study on the neural and psychophysical response to taste stimuli. Journal of Physiology 1192:13–20. [GAG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, G. A. V. & Marks, L. E. [1983] Twelve meanings of the measure constant in psychophysical power functions. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21:73–75 [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, E. G. [1950] A history of experimental psychology, 2d ed.Appleton-Century-Crofts. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. [1963] Eponym as placebo. In: History, psychology, and science: Selected papers, ed. Watson, R. I. & Campbell, D. T.. Wiley. [ES]Google Scholar
Bouman, M. A. [1961] History and present status of quantum theory in vision. In: Sensory communication, ed. Rosenblith, W. A.. MIT Press. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Boynton, R. M. [1984] Psychophysics. In: Visual measurements, vol. 5: Optical radiation, ed. Bartleson, C. J. & Grum, F.. Academic Press. [RMB]Google Scholar
Boynton, R. M. & Whitten, D. N. [1970] Visual adaptation in monkey cones: Recordings of late receptor potentials. Science 170:1423–26. [RMB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braida, L. D. & Durlach, N. I. [1972] Intensity perception. II: Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51:483–502. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braida, L. D., Durlach, N. I., Lim, J. S., Berliner, J. E., Rabinowitz, W. M. & Purks, S R. [1984] Intensity perception, XIII: Perceptual anchor model of context coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76:722–31. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brentano, F. [1874] Psychologie com empirischen Standpunkt. Duncker & Humblot. [aLEK, ES]Google Scholar
Bridgeman, B. [1986] Relations between the physiology of attention and the physiology of consciousness. Psychological Research 48:259–66. [ES]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronowski, I. J. [1959] Science and human values. Harper & Row. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. & d'Ydewalle, G. [1984] The subjective average between two brightnesses against different background luminances [in Dutch]. Psychologica Belgica 24:115–27. [MB]Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. & d'Ydewalle, G. [1988] Some requisites for a general theory of brightness perception, and a first approximation. In: Fechner Day '88, ed. Ross, H. E.. International Society for Psychophysics. [MB]Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M. & d'Ydewalle, G. [in press] The difference between stimulus and background: An explanation of the psychophysical function based on partition scales? International Fechner Symposium, Leipzig, 1987. North-Holland. [MB]Google Scholar
Burgess, A. & Barlow, H. B. [1983] The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots. Vision Research 23:811–20. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cain, W. S. [1977] Odor magnitude: Coarse vs. fine grain. Perception & Psychophysics 22:545–49. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. W., Nachmias, J. & Jukes, J. [1970] Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America 60.555–59. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canévet, G., Hellman, R. & Scharf, B. [1986] Group estimation of loudness in sound fields. Acustica 60:277–82. [RPH]Google Scholar
Carlyon, R. P. & Moore, B. C. J. [1984] Intensity discrimination: A severe departure from Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76:1369–76. [rLEK, RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlyon, R. P. & Moore, B. C. J. [1986] Continuous versus gated pedestals and the “severe departure” from Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79:453–60. [rLEK, RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, J. McK. [1893] On errors of observation. American Journal of Psychology 5:285–93. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. [1965] Subroutine STEPIT: Program GCPE 66. Indiana University, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. [1965] Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. [RNS]Google Scholar
Cobb, P. W. [1916] The effect on foveal vision of bright surroundings-IV. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1:540–66. [MB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comsweet, T. N. & Pinsker, H. M. [1965] Luminance discrimination of brief flashes under various conditions of adaptation. Journal of Physiology 176:294–310. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. C. [1974] Vibrotactile difference thresholds for intensity and the effect of a masking stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics 15:123–27. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, W. J. & Holway, A. H. [1937] On the law for minimal discrimination of intensities, I. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 23:23–28. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, D. W. [1970] Magnitude estimations and category judgments of brightness and brightness intervals: A two-stage interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83:201–8. [aLEK, SJR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, D. W., Attneave, F. & Harrington, T. L. [1968] A test of a two-stage model of magnitude judgment. Perception & Psychophysics 3:25–31. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, D. W. & Mullin, L. C. [1975] Judgments of average magnitude: Analyses in terms of the functional measurement and two-stage models. Perception & Psychophysics 18:299–308. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, D W. & JRule, S Rule, S [1977] Judgment of duration relations Simultaneous and sequential presentation Perception & Psychophysics 22:578–84 [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J. J. E. [1986] Perception with an eye for motion. Wiley. [JA]Google Scholar
Davis, H.Bowers, C. & Hirsh, S. K. [1968] Relations of the human vertex potential to acoustic input: Loudness and masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43:431–38 [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Silva, J A [1985] Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: Comparison of three psychophysical methods. American Journal of Psychology 98:119–44. [JA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, W. E. & Miller, M E [1978] Inverse attribute functions and the proposed modifications of the power law. Perception & Psychophysics 24:457–65. [arLEK, WJM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delboeuf, J. R. L. [1873] Etude psychophysique: Recherches théoriques et expérimentales sur la mesure des sensations et spécialement des sensations de lumière et de fatigue Mémoires couronnés et autres mémoires de I'Academie Royale de Belgique. Brussels: Hayez [MB, DJM, ES]Google Scholar
Dorfman, D D. [1982] RSCORE II. In: Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from signal detection theory, Swets, J. A. & Pickett, R. MAcademic Press [DDD]Google Scholar
Dorfman, D D. & Alf, E. Jr, [1969] Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals – rating-method data Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6.487–96. [DDD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duda, P D. [1975] Tests of the psychological meaning of the power law. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 1.188–94. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlach, N. I. & Braida, L. D. [1969] Intensity perception, I Preliminary theory of intensity resolution Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46:372–83. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dzhafarov, E N. [1982] Construction of spatial frequency scale by means of a modified method of fractioning [in Russian], Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal 3[1]:71–76 [JA]Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. [1890] Uber negative Empfindungswerts. Zeitschrift für Psychologic und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 1:320–34, 463–85 [RMW]Google Scholar
Eisler, H [1962a] Empirical test of a model relating magnitude and category scales. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 3:88–96. [aLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H [1962b] On the problem of category scales in psychophysics. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 3:81–87. [arLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H [1963a] How prothetic is the continuum of smell? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 4:29–32. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H [1963b] Magnitude scales, category scales, and Fechnerian integration. Psychological Review 70:243–53. [arLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H [1965a] The connection between magnitude and discrimination scales and direct and indirect scaling methods. Psychometrika 30.271–89. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisler, H [1965b] On psychophysics in general and the general psychophysical differential equation in particular. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 6:85–102. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H [1976] Experiments on subjective duration 1865/1975: A collection of power function exponents. Psychological Bulletin 83.1154–71. [JA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H [1982] On the nature of subjective scales Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 23.161–71. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H & Montgomery, H. [1974] On theoretical and realizable ideal conditions in psychophysics Magnitude and category scales and their relation. Perception & Psychophysics 16:157–68. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G [1956] Discriminal sensitivity on the subjective continuum. Acta Psychologica 12:233–43. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G [1959] Weber's law and related functions. Journal of Psychology 47.343–52. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G [1964] Is the power law a special case of Fechner's law? Perceptual & Motor Skills 19.730 [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G. & Akesson, C. [1965] Saltiness, sweetness, and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 6:241–53. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G. & Hosman, B. [1965] Note on subjective scales of number. Perceptual & Motor Skills 21:101–2. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmasian, R. & Bimbaum, M. H. [1984] A harmonious note on pitch: Scales of pitch derived from the subtractive model of comparison agree with the musical scale Perception & Psychophysics 36.531–37. [MHB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, E. F [1981] The dynamic range problem: Place and time coding at the level of cochlear nerve and nucleus. In: Neuronal mechanisms of hearing, ed. Syka, J. & Aitkin, L.. Plenum Press. [RPH]Google Scholar
Eyman, R. K. & Kim, P J. [1970] A model for partitioning judgment error in psychophysics. Psychological Bulletin 74:35–46. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagot, R. F. [1963] On the psychophysical law and estimation procedures in psychophysical scaling. Psychometrika 28:145–60. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falmagne, J.-C. [1971] The generalized Fechner problem and discrimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 8:22–43. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falmagne, J.-C. [1974] Foundations of Fechnerian psychophysics. In: Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, vol. 2: Measurement, psychophysics, and neural information processing, ed. Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C, Luce, R. D. & Suppes, P.. Freeman. [aLEK, JL]Google Scholar
Falmagne, J.-C. [1985] Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford University Press [aLEK, JL, LMW]Google Scholar
Fechner, G T. [1860] Elemente der Psychophysik, vols. 1 and 2. Breitkopf & Hartel. [aLEK, ES]Google Scholar
Fechner, G T. [1877] In Sachen der Psychophysik. Breitkopf & Hartel. [DJM, ES]Google Scholar
Fechner, G T. [1882] Revision der hauptpuncte der Psychophysik. Breitkopf & Hartel. [ES]Google Scholar
Fechner, G T. [1887] Uber die psychischen Massprincipien und das Weber'sche Gesetz. Philosophische Studien 4:161–230. [DJM, ES]Google Scholar
Fechner, G T. [1966] Elements of psychophysics, vol. 1, trans. Adler, H. E.. Holt, , Rinehart & Winston. [aLEK, ES, LMW]Google Scholar
Fechner, G T. [1987] My own viewpoint on mental measurement. Psychological Research 49 213–20 [translation of excerpts from Fechner 1887]. [ES]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feller, W. [1957] An introduction to probability theory and its applications, 2d ed.Wiley. [WJM]Google Scholar
Felsten, G & Wasserman, G A. [1980] Visual masking Mechanisms and theories. Psychological Bulletin 88.329–53. [GSW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, A. et al. [1940] Quantitative estimates of sensory events. Final report of the Committee appointed to consider and report upon the possibility of quantitative estimates of sensory events. Advancement of Science 1 331–49. [rLEK, RMB]Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P [1965] The character of physical law MIT Press. [LMW]Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P [1985] QED: The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton University Press. [LMW]Google Scholar
Fletcher, H. F. & Munson, W. A. [1933] Loudness. Its definition, measurement, and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 5:82–108. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florentine, M., Buus, S. & Mason, C. [1987] Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 81:1528–41. [rLEK, RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foley, H. J., Cross, D. V., Foley, A. & Reeder, R. R. [1983] Stimulus range, number of categories, and the “virtual” exponent. Perception & Psychophysics 34:505–12. [rLEK, GAG, RT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galanter, E. [1962] Contemporary psychophysics. In: New directions in psychology, vol. 1, ed. Brown, R., Galanter, E. & Hess, E. H.. Holt. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Galanter, E & Pliner, P. [1974] Cross-modal matching of money against other continua. In: Sensation and measurement. Papers in honor of S. S. Stevens, ed. Moskowitz, H. R., Scharf, B. & Stevens, J. C.. Reidel. [SP]Google Scholar
Garner, W R. [1952] An equal discriminability scale for loudness judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43:232–38. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, W R. [1954] A technique and a scale for loudness measurement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26.73–88. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, W R. [1958] Advantages of the discriminability criterion for a loudness scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30:1005–12. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, W R. [1962] Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. Wiley. [WJM]Google Scholar
Garner, W. R., Hake, H. W. & Eriksen, C. W. [1956] Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychological Review 63:149–59. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatti, A. & Dodge, R. [1929] Uber die Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit bei Reizung eines einzelnen, isolierten Tastorgans. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 69:405–26. [DL]Google Scholar
Gaydos, H. F. [1958] Sensitivity in the judgment of size by finger-span. American Journal of Psychology 71:557–62. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceissler, H.-G. [1975] Towards a new reconciliation of Stevens' and Helson's approaches to psychophysics: A tentative solution of the Stevens-Greenbaum puzzle. Acta Psychologica 39:417–26. [H-GG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceissler, H.-G. [1980] Perceptual representation of information: Dynamic frames of reference in judgment and recognition. In: Psychological research – Humboldt University, 1960/1980, ed. Klix, F. & Drause, B.. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. [H-GG]Google Scholar
Ceissler, H.-G. [1983a] Physical correlate theory versus indirect calibration approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:316-–17. [H-GG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceissler, H.-G. [1983b] The inferential basis of classification. In: Modern issues in perception, ed. Geissler, H.-G.. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. North-Holland. [H-GG]Google Scholar
Gescheider, G. A. [1976] Psychophysics: Method and theory. Erlbaum. [aLEK. JL]Google Scholar
Gescheider, G. A. & Collins, A. A. [1987] Absolute magnitude estimation of loudness by adults and children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Supplement 1, 82:S25. [GAG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. H. & Tomko, D L. [1972] The relation between magnitude and category estimates of tactile intensity. Perception & Psychophysics 12:135–38. [rLEK. RT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, V.Baird, J C. & Glesman, G. [1974] An empirical test of two psychophysical models. Acta Psychologica 38.59–72 [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, C. H. [1934] Psychophysics and behavior. Journal of General Psychology 10:299–310. [WJM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. M., Luce, R. D. & Duncan, J. E. [1977] Variability and sequential effects in magnitude production and estimation of auditory intensity Perception & Psychophysics 22:450–56. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. [1966] Signal detection theory and psychophysics Wiley. [arLEK, DDD. NAM, MT]Google Scholar
Gregson, R. A. M & Russell, P. N. [1965] Psychophysical power law exponent value for sucrose intensity. Perceptual & Motor Skills 20:294. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grotenfelt, A. [1888] Das Webersche Gesetz und die psychische Relativitaet [Weber's law and psychological relativity]. J. C Frenckell & Sohn. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. [1932] A generalized psychophysical law. Psychological Review 39:73–85. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, N. & Kalish, H. I. [1956] Discnminability and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 51.79–88. [RNS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gybels, J. & Van Hels, J. [1972] Unit activity from mechanoreceptors in human peripheral nerve during intensity documentation of touch. In Neurophysiology studied in man. ed. Somjen, G. G.Excerpta Medica. [GAG]Google Scholar
Hamer, R. D., Verrillo, R. T. & Zwislocki, J. J. [1983] Vibrotactile masking of Pacinian and non-Paciman channels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73:1293–1303. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, T. E., von Cierke, S. M. & Green, D. M. [1986] Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80:1335–40. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, C. & Birnbaum, M. H. [in press] The malleability of “ratio” judgments of occupational prestige. American Journal of Psychology. [MHB]Google Scholar
Harrington, T. & Merzenich, M. M. [1970] Neural coding in the sense of touch: Human sensations of skin indentation compared with the response of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hairy skin of monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 10.251–64. [GAG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. D. [1950] The effect of sensation levels on intensive discrimination of noise. American Journal of Psychology 63.409–21. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. D. [1963] Loudness discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders [Monograph Supplement no. 11] [DL]Google Scholar
Heinemann, E. G. [1961] The relation of apparent brightness to the threshold for differences in luminance. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61.389–99 [aLEK, MB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, E. G. [1978] Discriminability and ratio scaling. In: Visual psychophysics and physiology: A volume dedicated to Lornn Riggs. ed. Armington, J. C, Krauskopf, J. & Wooten, B. R.. Academic Press. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Hellman, R. P. [1976] Growth of loudness at 1,000 and 3,000 Hz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60:672–79. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, R. P. [1982] Loudness. annoyance, and noisiness produced by single-tone noise complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72:62–73. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellman, R. P. [1984] Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75:209–18. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellman, R. P. & Meiselman, C. H. [1988] Prediction of individual loudness exponents from cross-modality matching. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 31:605–15. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellman, R. P., Scharf, B., Teghtsoonian, M. & Teghtsoonian, R. [1987] On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82:448–53. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellman, R. P. & Zwislocki, J. J. [1961] Some factors affecting the estimation of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33:687–94. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, R. P. & Zwislocki, J. J. [1963] Monaural loudness function at 1.000 cps and interaural summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35:856–65. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, R. P. & Zwislocki, J. J. [1964] Loudness function of a 1,000-cps tone in the presence of a masking noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36:1618–27. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, R. P. & Zwislocki, J. J. [1968] Loudness determination at low sound frequencies Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43.60–64. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helson, H [1948] Adaptation level as a basis for quantitative theory of frames of reference Psychological Review 55:297–313. [WJM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helson, H [1964] Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior Harper & Row. [arLEK, MB]Google Scholar
Henng, E. [1876] Lehre von der Beziehung zwischen Leib und Seele, I: Mittheilung. Über Fechners Psychophysiches Gesetz. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin Math-naturw. Kl, 72:310–48. [DJM]Google Scholar
Hess, R. F. & Nordby, K. [1986] Spatial and temporal limits of vision in the achromat. Journal of Physiology 371:365–85 [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holway, A M & Pratt, C C [1936] The Weber ratio for intensitive discrimination. Psychological Review 43:322–40. [aLEK, MB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, D. C. & Finkelstein, M. A. [1979] Comparison of changes in sensitivity and sensation: Implications for the response-intensity function of the human photopic system. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 5:391–405. [aLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houtsma, A. J M., Durlach, N I & Braida, L D. [1980] Intensity perception, XI. Experimental results on the relation of intensity resolution to loudness matching. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68.807–13 [arLEK, RPH, NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovland, C. I. [1938] A note on Guilford's generalized psychophysical law. Psychological Review 45.430–34. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, A. & Poggio, T. [1988] Making machines [and artificial intelligence] see Daedalus 177:213–39. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Indow, T. [1982] An approach to geometry of visual space with no a priori mapping functions Multidimensional mapping according to Riemannian metrics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26:204–36. [TI]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indow, T. & Ida, M. [1977] Scaling of dot numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics 22:265–76. [JA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indow, T. & Stevens, S. S. [1966] Scaling of saturation and hue. Perception & Psychophysics 1:253–71. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization [1959] Expression of the physical and subjective magnitudes of sound. ISO/R 131–1959 [E]. Geneva. International Organization for Standardization. [RPH]Google Scholar
James, W. [1890] Principles of psychology, vol. 1. Holt. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Jesteadt, W, Wier, C. C & Green, D. M. [1977] Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61:169–77. [aLEK, MB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K. O. [1974] Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 37:48–72 [GAG]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K. O., Darian-Smith, I. & LaMotte, C. [1973] Peripheral neural determinants of temperature discrimination in man: A correlative study of responses to cooling skin. Journal of Neurophysiology 36:347–70. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, K. [1966] Some problems of measurement in psychophysics. Universitetsforlaget. [RNS]Google Scholar
Keidel, W. D., Keidel, U. O. & Wigand, M. E. [1961] Adaptation. Loss or gain of sensory information? In: Sensory communication, ed. Rosenblith, W. A.. MIT Press. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Keidel, W. D. & Spreng, M. [1965] Neurophysiological evidence for the Stevens power function in man. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 38:191–95. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knibestöl, M. & Vallbo, A. B. [1980] Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. Journal of Physiology 300.251–67 [arLEK, GAG, DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koehler, A. [1886] Ueber die hauptsaechlichsten Versuche einer mathematischen Formulirung des psychophysischen Gesetzes von Weber [On the main attempts to provide a mathematical formulation of Weber's psychophysical law]. Philosophische Studien 3:572–642. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H. [1971] Integration of just-noticeable differences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 8.591–99. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, D. H. [1972] A theory of magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9.168–99. [aLEK, TI, RNS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, D. H. [1972a] Visual scaling. In. Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 7/4: Visual psychophysics, ed. Jameson, D. & Hurvich, L.. Springer. [JA]Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H. [1974] Measurement theory and qualitative laws in psychophysics. In: Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, vol. 2: Measurement, psychophysics, and neural information processing, ed. Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C., Luce, R. D. & Suppes, P.. Freeman. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P. & Tversky, A. [1971] Foundations of measurement, vol. 1. Academic Press. [JL, BS]Google Scholar
Krantz, D. L. & Campbell, D. T. [1961] Separating perceptual and linguistic effects of context shirts upon absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:35–42. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E, Krueger. L. [1972] Perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics 11.5–9. [JA]Google Scholar
E, Krueger. L. [1984] Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments Perception & Psychophysics 35:536–42 [aLEK. JA, DL]Google Scholar
Kuhn, T S. [1970] The structure of scientific revolutions, 2d ed.University of Chicago Press [rLEK]Google Scholar
Lachs, G.. Al-Shaikh, R., Bi, Q., Saia, R. A. & Teich, M. C. [1984] A neuralcounting model based on physiological characteristics of the peripheral auditory system, V: Application to loudness estimation and intensity discrimination. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics SMC 14:819–36. [rLEK, RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laming, D. [1982] Differential coupling of sensory discriminations inferred from a survey of stable decision models for Weber's Law. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 35:129–61. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laming, D. [1986] Sensory analysis. Academic Press. [arLEK, DL, WJM, ECP, LMW]Google Scholar
Laming, D. [1987] The discrimination of smell and taste compared with other senses. Chemistry and Industry 5 01.12–18. [DL]Google Scholar
Laming, D. [1988] A reexamination of Sensory Analysis Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:316–39. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laming, D. [forthcoming] Continuing Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. [DL]Google Scholar
LaMotte, R. H. [1977] Psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of tactile sensibility In: Clothing comfort: Interaction of thermal, ventilation, construction, and assessment factors, ed. Hollies, N. R & Goldman, R. F.. Ann Arbor Science [rLEK. GAG]Google Scholar
Legge, G. E. [1979] Spatial frequency masking in human vision: Binocular interactions. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69:838–47. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legge, G E. & Viemeister, N. F [1988] Sensory analysis in vision and audition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:301–2 [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, A. [1886] Über die Anwendung der Methode der mittleren Abstufungen auf den Lichtsinn. Philosophische Studien 3.497–533 [DJM]Google Scholar
Leshowitz, B., Taub, H. B. & Raab, D. H. [1968] Visual detection of signals in the presence of continuous and pulsed backgrounds. Perception & Psychophysics 4:207–13. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Riemersma, J. B. & Bunt, A. A. [1972] Binaural additivity of loudness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 25:51–68. [BS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M. F. [1965] Category judgments as [unctions of flash luminance and duration]. Journal of the Optical Society of America 55:1655–60. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, J. S.Rabinowitz, W. M., Braida, L. D. & Durlach, N. I. [1977] Intensity perception, VIII. Loudness comparisons between different types of stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62:1256–67. Erratum [1978] 63:1233. [aLEK, NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipetz, L. E. [1971] The relation of physiological and psychological aspects of sensory intensity. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 1, ed. Loewenstein, W. R.. Springer-Verlag. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. [1972] What sort of measurement is psychophysical measurement? American Psychologist 27:96–106 [arLEK, JA]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, R. D. [1977] Thurstone's discriminal processes fifty years later. Psychometrika 42:461–89. [DDD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. & Edwards, W. [1958] The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences. Psychological Review 65:222–37. [aLEK, JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, R. D. & Galanter, E. [1963a] Discrimination. Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 1, ed Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R. & Galanter, E.. Wiley. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. & Galanter, E. [1963b] Psychophysical scaling. In: Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 1, ed. Luce, R. D, Bush, R. R. & Galanter, E.. Wiley. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., Green, D. M. & Weber, D. L. [1976] Attention bands in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics 20.49–54. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. & C, Krumhansl. [1988] Measurement, scaling, and psychophysics. In: Stevens Handbook of experimental psychology, 2d ed., vol. 1. ed. Atkinson, R., Herrnstein, R., Lindzey, G. & Luce, R. D.. Wiley. [WJM]Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. & Mo, S. S. [1965] Magnitude estimation of heaviness and loudness by individual subjects: A test of a probabilistic response theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 18:159–74. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D., Nosofsky, R. M., Green, D. M. & Smith, A. [1982] The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics 32:397–408. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, R D & Tukey, J. W. [1964] Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1:1–27. [BS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. M. [1963] Psychophysics of perceived intensity: A theoretical basis for Fechner's and Stevens' laws. Science 139:1213–16. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, N. A. [1987] Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes. In: Categorical perception, ed. Hamad, S.. Cambridge University Press. [NAM]Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., Braida, L. D. & Goldberg, R. F. [1987] Central and peripheral processes in the perception of speech and nonspeech sounds. In The Psychophysics of speech perception, ed. Schouten, M. E. H.. Martinus Nijhoff. [NAM]Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., Goldberg, R. F. & Braida, L. D. [1988] Resolution for speech sounds: Basic sensitivity and context memory on vowel and consonant continua. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84:1262–80. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., Moschetto, C. F., Bialostozky, F. M. & Engel, L. [1974] Size judgment: The presence of a standard increases the exponent of the power law. Perception & Psychophysics 16:340–46. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, R. J. W. [1973] Brightness function: Effect of area and duration. Journal of the Optical Society of America 63:913–20. [JA]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, R. J. W. [1974] Measurement, invariance, and psychophysics. In: Sensation and measurement, ed. Moskowitz, H. R. et al. Reidel. [JA]Google Scholar
Mansfield, R. J. W. [1976] Visual adaptation: Retinal transduction, brightness and sensitivity. Vision Research 16:679–90. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, R. J. W. [1976a] Psychophysics and the neural basis of information processing. In: Advances in psychophysics, ed. Geissler, H.-G. & Zabrodin, Yu. M.. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. [rLEK, H-GG]Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. [1968] Stimulus range, number of categories, and form of the category-scale. American Journal of Psychology 81:467–79. [ECP, SJR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, L. E. [1974a] On scales of sensation: Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science. Perception & Psychophysics 16:358–76. [aLEK, JA, RPH, DL, SJR, RT, LMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E. [1974b] Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. Academic Press [arLEK, BS]Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. [1978] Binaural summation of the loudness of pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64:107–13 [RPH, BS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, L. E. [1979] A theory of loudness and loudness judgments. Psychological Review 86:256–85. [aLEK, SP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E. [1980] Binaural summation of loudness: Noise and two-tone complexes. Perception & Psychophysics 27:489–98. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, L. E. [1986] Context and sensory processes: In search of basic laws. Cahiers de Psychology Cognitive 6:121–36. [JA]Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. & Bartoshuk, L. M. [1979] Ratio scaling of taste intensity by a matching procedure Perception & Psychophysics 26:335–39. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E., Szczesiul, R. & Ohlott, P. [1986] On the cross-modal perception of intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 12:517–34. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, R. L. [1983a] A JND-scale/category-scale convergence in taste. Perception & Psychophysics 34:77–83. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride, R. L. [1983b] Psychophysics: Could Fechner's assumption be correct? Australian Journal of Psychology 35:85–88. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, R. L. & Anderson, N. H. [in press] Integration psychophysics in the chemical senses. In: Psychological basis of sensory evaluation, ed. McBride, R. L. & MacFie, H.. Elsevier. [NHA]Google Scholar
McBumey, D. H. & Pfaffrnann, C. [1963] Gustatory adaptation to saliva and sodium chloride. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65:523–29. [DL]Google Scholar
McGarvey, H. [1943] Anchoring effects in the absolute judgment of verbal materials. Archives of Psychology 39 [86, whole no. 281]. Abstract. [WJM]Google Scholar
McGill, W. J. [1960] The slope of the loudness function: A puzzle. In: Psychological scaling, ed. Messick, S. & Gulliksen, H.. Wiley. [WJM]Google Scholar
McGill, W. J. [1967] Neural counting mechanisms and energy detection in audition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4:351–76. [WJM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, W. J. [1974] The slope of the loudness function: A puzzle. In: Sensation and measurement, ed. Moskowitz, H. R., Scharf, B. & Stevens, J. C.. Reidel. [WJM]Google Scholar
McGill, W. J. & Goldberg, J. P. [1968a] Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44:576–81. [aLEK, JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGill, W. J. & Goldberg, J. P. [1968b] A study of the near-miss involving Weber's law and pure-tone intensity discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 4.105–9. [aLEK, WJM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCill, W. J. & Teich, M. C. [in press] A unique approach of stimulus detection theory in psychophysics based upon the properties of zeromean Caussian noise. [Review of D. Laming, Sensory Analysis.] Journal of Mathematical Psychology. [rLEK]Google Scholar
McKelvie, S. J. & Shepley, K. [1977] Comparisons of intervals between subjective numbers, an extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills 45:1157–58. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, F. P. [1985] Another look at the “new psychophysics.” British Journal of Psychology 76:97–109. [aLE K]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellers, B. A. [1983b] Reply to Zwislocki's views on absolute scaling. Perception & Psychophysics 34:405–8. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B. A. & Birnbaum, M. H. [1982] Loci of contextual effects in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8:582–601. [MHB]Google ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B. A., Davis, D. M. & Birnbaum, M H. [1984] Weight of evidence supports one operation for “ratios” and “differences” of heaviness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10:216–30. [MHB]Google ScholarPubMed
Merrill, A. A. & Baird, J. C. [1979] Cognitive representation of spatial relations. III: A hypothetical environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology [General] 108:99–106. [JCB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. [1947] Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of white noise and its relation to masking and loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19:609–19. [WJM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. [1956] The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63:81–96. [NAM, WJM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. [1974] Stanley Smith Stevens: 1906–1973. American Journal of Psychology 87:279–88. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Montgomery, H. [1975] Direct estimation: Effect of methodological factors on scale type. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 16:19–29. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, B. & Raab, D. [1974] Pure tone intensity discrimination. Some experiments relating to the near-miss to Weber's law. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55:1049–54. [WJM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., Sakata, H. & Hyvannen, J. [1969] Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. Journal of Scurophysiology 32:452–84. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mover, R. S. & Landauer, T. K. [1967] Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature 215:1519–20. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Müller, G. E. [1878] Zur Grundlegung der Psychophysik. Grieben. [ES]Google Scholar
Myers, A. K. [1982] Psychophysieal scaling and scales of physical stimulus measurement. Psychological Bulletin 92.203–14 [arLEK, DJW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachmias, J. & Steinman, R. M. [1965] Brightness and discriminability of light flashes. Vision Research 5:545–57. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narens, L. [1985] Abstract measurement theory. MIT Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Newman, E. B. [1933] The validity of the just noticeable difference as a unit of psychological magnitude. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 36:172–75. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nihm, S. D. [pseudonym of Bimbaum, M. H.] [1976] Polynomial law of sensation [satire]. American Psychologist 31:808–9. [aLEK, DJW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisly, S. & Wasserman, G. S. [in press] Intensity dependence of perceived duration: Data, theories, and neural integration. Psychological Bulletin. [GSW]Google Scholar
Noma, E. & Baird, J. C. [1975] Psychophysical study of numbers, II: Theoretical models of number generation. Psychological Research 35:81–95. [arLEK, JCB, RT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norwich, K. H. [1981] The magical number seven: Making a “bit” of “sense.” Perception & Psychophysics 29:409–22. [JA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norwich, K. H. [1984] The psychophysics of taste from the entropy of the stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics 35:269–78. [aLEK, KHN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norwich, K. H. [1987] On the theory of Weber fractions. Perception ir Psychophysics 42:286–98. [aLEK, JA, KHN, LMW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosofslcy, R. M. [1983a] Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity. Perception & Psychophysics 33:103–12. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosofslcy, R. M. [1983b] Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and critical noise in absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9.299–309. [NAM]Google Scholar
Oberlin, K. W. [1936] Variation in intensive sensitivity to lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19:438–55. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, H. [1967] Difference threshold for stimulus length under simultaneous and nonsimuhaneous viewing conditions. Perception & Psychophysics 2.201–7. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, E., Tzuo, H. & Tzuo, P. L. [1980] Weber's law, the “near miss,” and binaural detection. Perception & Psychophysics 28:354–64. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panek, D. W. & Stevens, S. S. [1966] Saturation of red A prothetic continuum. Perception & Psychophysics 1:59–66. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parducci, A. [1963] Range-frequency compromise in judgment. Psychological Monographs 77 [no. 2, whole no. 565]:l–50. [arLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parducci, A. [1974] Contextual effects. A range-frequency analysis. In: Handbook of perception, vol. 2, ed. Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P.. [H-GG]Google Scholar
Parducci, A. [1982] Category ratings. Still more contextual effects. In: Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement, ed. Wegener, B. Erlbaum. [arLEK, RT]Google Scholar
Parker, S., Casey, J., Ziriax, J. & Silberberg, A. [1988] Random monotone data fit simple algebraic functions. Correlation is not confirmation. Psychological Bulletin 104:417–23. [SP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. & Schneider, B. [1974] Non-metric scaling of loudness and pitch using similarity and difference estimates. Perception & Psychophysics 15:238–42. [BS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. & Schneider, B. [1980] Loudness and loudness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 28.398–406. [arLEK, JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, S, Schneider, B. & Kanow, G. [1975] Ratio scale measurement of the perceived lengths of lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1:195–204. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Phillips, J. P. N. [1964] A note on Treisman's model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:386. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. R. [1976] Spatial response characteristics of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the palmar, skin of the monkey Dissertation. University of Melbourne. [GAG]Google Scholar
Pieron, H. [1952] The sensations. Their functions, processes, and mechanisms, trans. Pirenne, M. H. & Abbott, B. C.. Yale University Press. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Plateau, J. A. F. [1872a] Sur la mesure des sensations physiques et sur la loi qui lie I'intensité de ces sensations à I'intensité de la cause excitante. Bulletins de l‘Académte Royale de Belgique. 2d series, 33:37688. [DJM, ES, RNS]Google Scholar
Plateau, J. A. F. [1872b] Un mot au sujet du mémoire présenté par M. Delboeuf. Bulletins de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, 2d series, 34:141–42. [DJM]Google Scholar
Plateau, J. A. F. [1873] Über die Messung Physischer Empfindungen und das Gesetz, welches die Stärke dieser Empfindungen mit der Stärke der erregenden Ursache verknüpft. Poggendorfs Annalen 150:465–76. [ES]Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. [1959] The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books. [RMB]Google Scholar
Popper, R., Parker, S. & Galanter, E [1986] Dual loudness scales in individual subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12:61–69. [arLEK, SP]Google ScholarPubMed
Poulton, E. C. [1968] The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin 69:1–19. [aLEK, DL, SJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, E. C. [1979] Models for biases in judging sensory magnitudes. Psychological Bulletin 86:777–803. [aLEK, DL, ECP, LMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, E. C. [1981] Schooling and the new psychophysics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:201–3. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, E. C. [1986] Why unbiased numerical magnitude judgments of the loudness of noise are linear in decibels: A rejoinder to the Teghtsoonians. Perception & Psychophysics 40:131–34. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulton, E. C. [1989] Bias in quantifying judgments. Erlbaum. [DL, ECP]Google Scholar
Raab, D., Fehrer, E. & Hershenson, M. [1961] Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61:193–99. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Restle, F. [1961] Psychology of judgment and choice. Wiley. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Riesz, R. R. [1928] Differential intensity sensitivity of the ear for pure tones. Physical Review 31:867–75. [KHN]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesz, R. R. [1933] The relationship between loudness and the minimum perceptible increment of intensity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 4:211–16. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, F. S. [1979] Measurement theory with applications to decision making, utility, and social sciences. Addison-Wesley. [JL]Google Scholar
Robinson, D. W. [1957] The subjective loudness scale. Acustica 7:217–33. [RPH]Google Scholar
Robinson, G. H. [1976] Biasing power law exponents by magnitude estimation instructions. Perception & Psychophysics 19:80–84. [aLEK, SJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, S. [1941] The anchoring of absolute judgments. Archives of Psychology 37 [42, whole no. 261]. [WJM]Google Scholar
Rose, B. J. & Bimbaum, M. H. [1975] Judgments of differences and ratios of numerals. Perception & Psychophysics 18:194–200. [MHB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, B. S. [1965] The power law and subjective scales of number. Perceptual 6 Motor Skills 21:42. [aLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, B. S. & Goff, W. R. [1967] Electrical responses of the nervous system and subjective scales of intensity. In: Contributions to sensory physiology, vol. 2, ed. Neff, W. D.. Academic Press. [aLEK, RMW]Google Scholar
Ross, J. & di Lollo, V. [1970] A consistent failure of the power law for lifted weight. Perception & Psychophysics 8.289–90. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S. J. [1969] Equal discriminability scale of number. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79:35–38. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S. J. [1971] Discriminability scales of number for multiple and fractional estimates. Ada Psychologica 35:328–33. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S. J. [1972] Comparisons of intervals between subjective numbers. Perception & Psychophysics 11 97–98. [arLEK, SJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S. J. & Curtis, D. W. [1973a] Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology 97:305–9. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S. J. & Curtis, D. W. [1973b] Reevaluation of two models for judgments of perceptual intervals. Perception 6 Psychophysics 14:433–36. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S. J. & Curtis, D. W. [1977] Subject differences in input and output transformations from magnitude estimation of differences Ada Psychologica 41:61–65. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rule, S. J. & Curtis, D. W. [1982] Levels of sensory and judgmental processing: Strategies for the evaluation of a model. In: Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement, ed. Wegener, B.. Erlbaum. [aLEK, MHB, SJR]Google Scholar
Rule, S. J., Curtis, D. W. & Markley, R. P. [1970] Input and output transformations from magnitude estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86:343–49. [aLEK, SJR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rule, S. J., Laye, R. C. & Curtis, D. W. [1974] Magnitude judgments and difference judgments of lightness and darkness: A two-stage analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103.1108–14. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, C. W. [1970] The measurement of sensation: A critique of perceptual psychophysics. University of California Press. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Scharf, B. [1970] Critical bands. In: Foundations of modern auditory theory, vol. 1, ed. Tobias, J.. Academic Press. [RPH]Google Scholar
Scharf, B. [1978] Loudness. In: Handbook of perception, vol. 4, ed. Carterette, E. & Friedman, M. P.. Academic Press. [RPH]Google Scholar
Scheerer, E. [in press] The historical fate and the future prospects of Fechner's inner psychophysics. In: Psychophysical foundations of cognitive theory, ed. Geissler, H.-G.. Mouton. [ES]Google Scholar
Schneider, B. [1980] Individual loudness functions determined from direct comparisons of loudness intervals. Perception & Psychophysics 28:493–503. [SP, BS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B. [1988] The additivity of loudness across critical bands: A conjoint measurement approach. Perception & Psychophysics 43:211–22. [rLEK, BS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B. & Parker, S. [1987] Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in notched noise. Perception & Psychophysics 41.253–61. [rLEK, SP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B., Parker, S., Farrell, G. & Kanow, G. [1976] The perceptual basis of loudness ratio judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 19:309–20. [BS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., Parker, S., Ostrosky, D., Stein, D. & Kanow, G. [1974] A scale for the psychological magnitude of number. Perception & Psychophysics 16:43–46. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., Parker, S. & Stein, D. [1974] The measurement of loudness using direct comparisons of sensory intervals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 11:259–73. [BS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., Parker, S., Valenti, M., Farrell, G. & Kanow, G. [1978] Response bias in category and magnitude estimation of difference and similarity for loudness and pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 4:483–96. [SP, BS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutz, H. G. & Pilgrim, F. J. [1957] Differential sensitivity in gustation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54:41–48. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, C. L., Braida, L. D., Davis, M. F. & Colbum, H. S. [1976] A model for auditory localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60:1164–75. [NAM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, R. N. [1958] Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55:509–23. [RNS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, R. N. [1962] Analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, I & II. Psychometrika 27:125–40, 219–45. [RNS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1965] Approximation to uniform gradients of generalization by monotone transformations of scale. In: Stimulus generalization, ed. Mostofsky, D. I.. Stanford University Press. [RNS]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1966] Metric structures in ordinal data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3:287–315. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1966a] What does the psychophysicist measure? Unpublished note. Harvard University. [RNS]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1978] On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement. In: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 9. Perception and cognition issues in the foundations of psychology, ed. Savage, C. W.. University of Minnesota Press [aLEK, TI, RNS]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1981a] Psychological relations and psychological scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 24:21–57. [aLEK, ECP, RNS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1981b] Psychophysical complementarity. In: Perceptual organization, ed. Kubovy, M. & Pomerantz, J.. Erlbaum. [RNS]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1982] Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review 89:305–33. [RNS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, R. N. [1987a] Evolution of a mesh between principles of the mind and regularities of the world. In: The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality, ed. Dupré, J.. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [RNS]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. [1987b] Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237.1317–23. [RNS, LMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. L. [1988] Encoding of sound intensity by auditory neurons In. The auditory system: Development, physiology, and psychophysics, ed. Edelman, G. M., Gall, W. E. & Cowan, W. M.. Wiley. [RPH]Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G. [1975] Psychophysics. In: Experimental sensory psychology, ed. Scharf, B., Scott, , Foresman. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Solomons, L. M. [1900] A new explanation of Weber's law. Psychological Review 7.234–40. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staddon, J. E. R. [1978] Theory of behavioral power functions. Psychological Review 85:305–20. [DJW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. C. [1957] A comparison of ratio scales for the loudness of white noise and the brightness of white light. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard University. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Stevens, J. C. [1958] Stimulus spacing and the judgment of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56:246–50. [aLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, J. C. & Marks, L. E. [1980] Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation. Perception & Psychophysics 5:379–89. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. C. & Stevens, S. S. [1963] Brightness function: Effects of adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America 53:375–85. [rLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, J. C. & Tulving, E. [1957] Estimations of loudness by a group of untrained observers. American Journal of Psychology 70:600–605. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, S. S. [1946] On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103:677–80. [aLEK, JA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1953] On the brightness of lights and the loudness of sounds. Science 118:576. Abstract. [RPH]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1955] The measurement of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27:815–29. [RPH, WJM, RMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1956] The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes – loudness. American Journal of Psychology 69:1–25. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, S. S. [1957a] Concerning the form of the loudness function. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29:603–6. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1959] On the validity of the loudness scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31:995–1003. [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1960] The psychophysics of sensory function. American Scientist 48:226–53. [MT]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1964] Concerning the psychophysical power law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:383–85. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1966] Operations or words? Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80 [no. 19, whole no 627, part 2]:[33–38. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, S. S. [1969] Sensory scales of taste intensity. Perception & Psychophysics 6.302–8. [ECP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1971a] Sensory power functions and neural events. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 1, ed. Loewenstein, W. R.. Springer-Verlag. [arLEK]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1971b] Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review 78:426–50. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [1975] Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects, ed. Stevens, G.. Wiley. [arLEK, JA, MB, RPH, ES]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. & Galanter, E. H. [1957] Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54:377–411. [ECP, MT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, S. S. & Guirao, M. [1962] Loudness, reciprocality, and partition scales. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34:1466–71. [RMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. & Stevens, J. C. [1960] The dynamics of visual brightness. Psychophysical Project Report PPR-246, Laboratory of Psychophysics, Harvard University. [TI]Google Scholar
Stone, H. [1963] Determination of odor difference limens for three compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 466–73. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, H. & Bosley, J. J. [1965] Olfactory discrimination and Weber's Law. Perceptual and Motor Skills 20:657–65. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, H., Ough, C. S. & Pangborn, R. M. [1962] Determination of odor difference thresholds. Journal of Food Science 27:197–202. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, R. [1971] On the exponents in Stevens law and the constant in Ekman's law. Psychological Review 78.71–80. [arLEK, H-GG, DL, KHN, ECP, RT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teghtsoonian, R. [1973] Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens law. American Journal of Psychology 86:3–27. [arLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, R. [1974] On facts and theories in psychophysics: Does Ekman's law exist? In: Sensation and measurement: Papers in honor of S. S. Stevens, ed. Moskowitz, H. R., Scharf, B. & Stevens, J. C.. Reidel. [aLEK, RT]Google Scholar
Teghtsoonian, R. [1975] Review of S. S. Stevens Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. American Journal of Psychology 88.677–84. [RT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, R. & Teghtsoonian, M. [1978] Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling. Perception & Psychophysics 24.305–14. [aLEK, RT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thouless, R. H. [1931] Phenomenal regression to the “real” object, I and II British Journal of Psychology 21.339–59; 22:1–30. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. [1927] A law of comparative judgment Psychological Review 34:273–86. [aLEK, NAM]Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. [1927a] Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology 38.368–89. [DDD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. [1948] Psychophysical methods. In: Methods of psychology, ed. Andrews, T G.. Wiley. [DDD]Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. [1905] Experimental psychology: Quantitative. Macmillan. [RMW]Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B. [1909] Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought processes. Macmillan. [RMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, E. B. [1923/1905] Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice, vol. 2: Qualitative experiments; part 2, instructor's manual. Macmillan. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. [1961] Distances and ratios in psychological scaling. Ada Psychologica 19:201–5. [aLEK, MHB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1962] Psychological explanation: The “private data” hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13:130–43. [aLEK, MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1963b] Neural effects and the psychophysical law. Nature 200:1241–42. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1963c] Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the “internal clock.” Psychological Monographs 77, no. 576. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, M. [1964a] Sensory scaling and the psychophysical law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:11–22. [aLEK, RNS, MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1964b] What do sensory scales measure? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:387–91. [aLEK, MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1964c] Noise and Weber's law: The discrimination of brightness and other dimensions. Psychological Review 71:314–30. [MT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, M. [1965] Signal detection theory and Crozier's law: Derivation of a new sensory scaling procedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2:205–18. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1966] A statistical decision model for sensory discrimination which predicts Weber's law and other sensory laws: Some results of a computer simulation. Perception & Psychophysics 1:203–30. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. [1970] Brightness contrast and the perceptual scale. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 23.205–24. [MT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, M. [1974] A hierarchical model of perception and sensory scaling. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference of Psychology. University of Tokyo Press. [MT]Google Scholar
Treisman, M. [1985] The magical number seven and some other features of category scaling: Properties of a model for absolute judgment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29:175–230. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. & Irwin, R. J. [1967] Auditory intensity discriminal scale I: Evidence derived from binaural intensity summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 42:586–92. [MT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, M. or Watts, T. R. [1966] Relation between signal detectability theory and the traditional procedures for measuring sensory thresholds: Estimating d' from results given by the method of constant stimuli. Psychological Bulletin 66:438–54. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. [1957] On the comparative anatomy of transformations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28:602–32. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. [1977] Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley. [DJW]Google Scholar
van Nes, F. L. & Bouman, M. A. [1967] Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America 57:401–6. [rLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nes, F. L., Koenderink, J. J, Nas, H. & Bouman, M. A. [1967] Spatiotemporal modulation transfer in the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America 57.1082–88. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veit, C. T. [1978] Ratio and subtractive processes in psychophysical judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology [General] 107:81–107. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verrillo, R. T., Fraiolo, A. J. & Smith, R. L. [1969] Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 6:366–72. [GAG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viemeister, N. F. [1972] Intensity discrimination of pulsed sinusoids. The effects of filtered noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51:1265–69. [WJM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volkmann, A W. [1863] Physiologische Untersuchungen im Gebiete der Optik Breitkopf & Hartel. [DL]Google Scholar
von Kries, J. [1882] Über die Messung intensiver Grössen and über das sogenannte psychophysische Gesetz. Vierteljahrsschrift fur wissenschaftliche Philosphie 6:257–94. [RMW]Google Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A. [1975] Stevens vs. Fechner: A plea for dismissal of the case. Ada Psychologica 39:225–35. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, W. A. [1982] Misperception of exponential growth and the psychological magnitude of numbers. In: Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement, ed. Wegener, B.. Erlbaum. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Wang, L. T. & Wasserman, G. S. [1985] Direct intracellular measurement of non-linear postreceptor transfer functions in dark and light adaptation in Limulus. Brain Research 328:41–50 [aLEK, GSW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, L. M. [1971] Some psychophysical properties of category judgments and magnitude estimations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Ward, L. M. [1972] Category judgments of loudnesses in the absence of an experimenterinduced identification function. Sequential effects and power-function fit. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94:179–84. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, L. M. [1973] Repeated magnitude estimations with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics 13:193–200. [arLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, L. M. [1987] Measurement, scaling, and fundamental psychophysics In: Fechner Day '87, ed. Teghtsoonian, M. & Teghtsoonian, R.. International Society for Psychophysics. [LMW]Google Scholar
Warren, R. M. [1958] A basis for judgment of sensory intensity. American Journal of Psychology 71 675–87. [RNS, RMW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, R. M. [1969] Visual intensity judgments: An empirical rule and a theory. Psychological Review 76.16–30. [aLEK, RMW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. M. [1977] Subjective loudness and its physical correlate. Acustica 37.334–46. [RMW]Google Scholar
Warren, R. M. [1981] Measurement of sensory intensity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:175–223, Continuing Commentary [1983] 6:316–20. [arLEK, JL, ECP, RMW, DJW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R M., Sersen, E. A. & Pores, E. B. [1958] A basis for loudness judgments. American Journal of Psychology 71:700–709. [RNS, RMW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, R. M. & Warren, R. P. [1958] Basis for judgments of relative brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America 48:445–50. [RMW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, R. M. & Warren, R. P. [1968] Helmholtz on perception: Its physiology and development. Wiley. [RMW]Google Scholar
Wasserman, G. S., Felsten, G. & Easland, G. S. [1979] The psychophysical function. Harmonizing Fechner and Stevens. Science 204:85–87. [aLEK, GSW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasserman, G. S. & Kong, K.-L. [1979] Absolute timing of mental activities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2.243–304. [GSW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, G. S., Wang-Bennett, L. T. & Miyamoto, R. T. [in press] Temporal dispersion in natural receptors and pattern discrimination mediated by artificial receptors [cochlear implants]. In: Proceedings of the Fechner Centennial Symposium, ed. Buflart, H.. Elsevier. [GSW]Google Scholar
Weiss, D. J. [1972] Averaging: An empirical validity criterion for magnitude estimation. Perception & Psychophysics 12:385–88. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissmann, S. M., Hollingsworth, S. R. & Baird, J. C. [1975] Psychophysical study of numbers, III: Methodological applications Psychological Research 38:97–115. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, G. & Mountcastle, V. B. [1968] Quantitative relations between mechanical stimuli to the skin and neural responses evoked by them In. The skin senses, ed. Kenshalo, D.. Thomas. [rLEK, GAG]Google Scholar
Wetherill, G. B. & Levitt, H. [1965] Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 18:1–10. [MB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, J. A. & Zurek, W. H. [1983] Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton University Press. [JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. G. & Stelmack, R. M. [1982] Power functions of loudness magnitude estimations and auditory brainstem-evoked responses. Perception 6 Psychophysics 31:561–65. [rLEK, SP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodworth, R. S. [1914] Professor Cattell's psychophysical contributions. Archives of Psychology 30 60–74. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. [1938] Experimental psychology. Holt. [aLEK, MB]Google Scholar
Wundt, W. [1880] Crundzuege der physiologischen Psychologie [Elements of physiological psychology], 2d ed., vol. 1. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Wundt, W. [1885] Ueber das Weber'sche Gesetz [On Weber's law] Philosophische Studien 2:1–36. [aLEK]Google Scholar
Yilmaz, H. [1967] Perceptual invariance and the psychophysical law. Perception & Psychophysics 2:533–38. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, W. M. [1974] The coding of disparity as a function of directional separation and feature similarity. Doctoral dissertation, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH. Reported in Gulic, W. L. & Lawson, R. B. [1976] Human stereopsis: A psychophysical approach. Oxford University Press [JCB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicker, E. [1958] Ueber psychologische und methodische Grundlagen der Lautheit. Acustica 8:237–58.Google Scholar
Zwicker, W., Flottorp, G. & Stevens, S. S. [1957] Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29.548–57 [RPH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwislocki, J. J. [1965] Analysis of some auditory characteristics. In. Handbook of mathematical psychology, ed. Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R. & Galanter, E.. Wiley [RPH]Google Scholar
Zwislocki, J. J. [1974] A power function for sensory receptors. In: Sensation and Measurement. Papers in honor of S S. Stevens, ed. Moskowitz, H. R., Scharf, B. & Stevens, J. C.. Reidel. [GAG, RPH]Google Scholar
Zwislocki, J. J. [1983a] Absolute and other scales: Question of validity Perception & Psychophysics 33.593–94. [aLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwislocki, J. J. [1983b] Croup and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates. Perception & Psychophysics 33:460–68. [aLEK, GAG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwislocki, J. J & Goodman, D. A. [1980] Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation Perception & Psychophysics 28:28–38. [aLEK, RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwislocki, J. J & Jordan, H. N. [1986] On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise, journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79:772–80. [arLEK, RPH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed