What is the provision in an insurance policy that indicates what is denied coverage?

journal article

PROPERTY INSURERS' RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS UNDER POLICY PROVISIONS THAT PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY OF OTHERS

Tort & Insurance Law Journal

Vol. 32, No. 3 (SPRING 1997)

, pp. 787-805 (19 pages)

Published By: American Bar Association

https://www.jstor.org/stable/25763183

Publisher Information

With nearly 400,000 members, the ABA provides law school accreditation, continuing legal education, information about the law, programs to assist lawyers and judges in their work, and initiatives to improve the legal system for the public.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Tort & Insurance Law Journal © 1997 American Bar Association
Request Permissions

Abstract

Unequal bargaining power between insurers and insureds very early gave rise to common law doctrines prescribing rights against insurers outside the terms of the insurance contract. Professor Keeton examines present regulation, judge-made and legislative, serving the same protective function. In this first of two parts the article isolates three principles that together, under various doctrinal rubrics and as reflected in legislation, account for most rights at variance with insurance provisions. Part two will appear next month.

Journal Information

The Harvard Law Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. Each issue also contains pieces by student editors. Published monthly from November through June, the Review has roughly 2,000 pages per volume. All articles--even those by the most respected authorities--are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone. The November issue contains the Supreme Court Foreword (usually by a prominent constitutional scholar), the faculty Case Comment, twenty-five Case Notes (analyses by third-year students of the most important decisions of the previous Supreme Court Term), and a compilation of Court statistics. The February issue features the annual Developments in the Law project, an in-depth treatment of an important area of the law.

Publisher Information

Founded in 1887 by future Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, the Harvard Law Review is an entirely student-edited journal that is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Approximately ninety student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of four, carry out day-to-day operations. Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. The Review also provides opportunities for its members to develop their own editing and writing skills. All student writing is unsigned, reflecting the fact that many members of the Review, in addition to the author and supervising editor, make a contribution to each published piece.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Harvard Law Review © 1970 The Harvard Law Review Association
Request Permissions

What Is a Wear and Tear Exclusion?

A wear and tear exclusion is a provision in an insurance policy that states that the normal deterioration of the insured object is not covered by the insurance policy. Insurance is designed only to protect against unforeseen losses. If insurance covered inevitable losses, insurers would have to raise their premiums dramatically to cover the expenses.

Key Takeaways

  • A wear and tear exclusion in an insurance contract states that losses due to normal deterioration of the insured property are not covered.
  • The list of exclusions in a policy may be extensive.
  • The insurer and insured may disagree on whether wear and tear contributed to the damage.

Understanding the Wear and Tear Exclusion

Wear and tear exclusions are fairly common. Auto insurance policies, for example, do not cover the cost of replacing auto parts that deteriorate with time and use, such as brake pads, timing belts, and water pumps. Auto insurance policies cover only unpredictable events such as collisions.

Wear and tear exclusions are designed to keep an insurer from being held liable when damage results from a customer’s failure to properly maintain, repair, and replace deteriorated or defective portions of the insured property. To prepare for predictable losses from wear and tear, owners can self-insure by setting aside money each month in an emergency fund.

Exclusions Are Specified

The exclusions and limitations that are specified in the contract are what determine if a property loss is covered. The list of exclusions is generally extensive.

An insurance company may cite “wear and tear” on a claim in an effort to avoid a contractual payment. In the case of a natural disaster such as a flood or tornado, insurers will often try to invoke “wear and tear” and blame the property damage on a preexisting condition.

Other common exclusions include poor maintenance, prior damage, manufacturing defects, or faulty installation. Roof damage claims are often a cause of contention. Insurers may point to the age of the roof or its maintenance record as a cause of the damage instead of a hailstorm.

Damage to older properties is often the cause of disputes between insured and insurer.

When Parties Disagree

A dispute over a claim can result in an insurance bad faith lawsuit. This is particularly common when older commercial properties are damaged. An insurance company will inspect the property prior to selling the policy, and the report may show the property was in acceptable or even good condition, but the insurance company may still attempt to make the “wear and tear” argument.

Wear and Tear Exclusion and Anti-Concurrent Cause Language

A wear and tear exclusion will not have what is commonly referred to as “anti-concurrent cause” lead-in language. This indicates that damage caused or aggravated by multiple factors, including covered and uncovered causes, will not be covered. An Illinois court ruled in 1983 that, in the absence of such “anti-concurrent cause” lead-in language, when a covered and an uncovered peril combine to cause a loss, the whole loss is covered.

What is in the conditions section of an insurance policy?

Common conditions in a policy include the requirement to file a proof of loss with the company, to protect property after a loss, and to cooperate during the company's investigation or defense of a liability lawsuit.

What are the 4 parts of an insurance contract?

There are four basic parts to an insurance contract: Declaration Page..
Excluded perils or causes of loss..
Excluded losses..
Excluded property..

What is Indisputability clause?

Indisputability clause This ensures that insurers do not arbitrarily dismiss claims on grounds of inaccurate declaration by the policyholder.

What is a premium on an insurance policy?

The amount you pay for your health insurance every month. In addition to your premium, you usually have to pay other costs for your health care, including a deductible, copayments, and coinsurance. If you have a Marketplace health plan, you may be able to lower your costs with a premium tax credit.